Hauling safety

/ Hauling safety
  • Thread Starter
#21  
powerstroke444e said:
What I don't get is why people think a big motor makes pulling anything safer. IE We had a F250 with a 300 6cyl & it had the same brakes frame & axles as the one with a 460, the only differance was the 460 would get you there alot quicker. So yes if you tow every day the big motor will pull better but the brakes, frame & springs are very close to the same on all 3/4tons of the same make, only differance is how if you need low range to get it moving or high range. but with that said everything I own has a smoker in it other than the weedeater(still working on that one any ideas are welcome).

I can think of a small difference a large engine might make in braking ability. On trucks so equipped ( like the larger diesels, when in tow mode), when you let off the gas.. the engine really starts dragging you down pretty fast.. almost like a jake brake.. I know my f250 diesel coasts to a stop MUCH faster than my dodge gasser.. and it's due to that compression braking I'm thinking..

soundguy
 
/ Hauling safety #22  
Soundguy said:
I can think of a small difference a large engine might make in braking ability. On trucks so equipped ( like the larger diesels, when in tow mode), when you let off the gas.. the engine really starts dragging you down pretty fast.. almost like a jake brake.. I know my f250 diesel coasts to a stop MUCH faster than my dodge gasser.. and it's due to that compression braking I'm thinking..

soundguy

Diesels do not do compression braking nearly as well as a gasser since the air intake is wide open all the time unlike a gasser where when you take your foot off the accelerator the air intake is closed down forcing the engine to work hard to bring in air to compress.

Jake brakes change the valve timing so the engine is compressing air with no way to get out the exhaust.

Small diesels such as in a pickup do not have jake brakes. Instead they can be fitted with exhaust brakes as an aftermarket custom installation. This is a butterfly valve in the exhaust path to extract energy from the exhaust stream and force the engine to do work to push the exhaust out. Diesels have copious exhaust flow at high RPM even with no throttle applied due to the intake being wide open.

The throttle is coupled to the control mechanism so above idle the brake is OFF.

That is the way I understand them (at least up to my '97 Dodge.)

My 2008 F-250 PowerStroke Diesel has a lot more braking effect then my Cumins 5.9 (when not using exhaust brake on Cumins) but I don't know why. It is especially noticeable when in tow/haul mode mostly, I think, due to aggressive shift pattern when in that mode.

Pat
 
/ Hauling safety
  • Thread Starter
#23  
I never meant to imply that a pickup truck had a jake brake.. just that my 04 diesel in haul mode.. when you let of fthe throttle, it agressivel slows down with a good bit of increase in engine nose.. reminiscent of a 'mild' jake brake'.. my gasser.. when you let of fthe gas.. rpm drops to idle and the truck continues to speed downt he highway slowing down ever so slowly.

If I had to guess.. I'd think it was something in the torque converter locking up and dragging the rpm down...??

soundguy
 
/ Hauling safety #24  
My 2008 F-250 PowerStroke Diesel has a lot more braking effect then my Cumins 5.9 (when not using exhaust brake on Cumins) but I don't know why. It is especially noticeable when in tow/haul mode mostly, I think, due to aggressive shift pattern when in that mode.
I have seen similar braking differences between manufactures of the 15 passenger vans I drive, for example; moms '99 E350 w/the 7.3L Powerstroke has a good bit more engine braking than the '05 E350 with the 5.4L gas engine at the hotel where I work, however the '05 E350 has more engine braking that the '05 Chevrolet Express 3500 that we also have at the hotel.

Aaron Z
 
/ Hauling safety #25  
Soundguy said:
I never meant to imply that a pickup truck had a jake brake.. just that my 04 diesel in haul mode.. when you let of fthe throttle, it agressivel slows down with a good bit of increase in engine nose.. reminiscent of a 'mild' jake brake'.. my gasser.. when you let of fthe gas.. rpm drops to idle and the truck continues to speed downt he highway slowing down ever so slowly.

If I had to guess.. I'd think it was something in the torque converter locking up and dragging the rpm down...??

soundguy

I get a similar effect with my 2008 F-250 and I too don't know how it does it. My Dodge/Cumins free wheels in the tranny on deceleration and had to be modified to keep the torque converter locked up so the exhaust brake could work.

I hope the torque converter stays locked up but the retardation force seems to be definitely more than just a locked up converter hooked to a diesel with little fueling. Again, diesels without variable valve timing Jake brakes (or exhaust brakes) do not offer as much "compression braking" as a gasser. At least that was conventional wisdom before I drove the new F-250 which apparently acts like the Soundguy's Ford. I guess we will have to investigate this.

Oh, and Soundguy, I know you know what Jakes and exhaust brakes are and do. What we have here is a little mystery as to what is going on with our Fords.

It seems to me that the retardation is too pronounced to not be "different" from just a tranny hooked to a diesel. In tow/haul mode I like the way the tranny keeps down shifting fairly aggressively. When the 2008 was new, I looked for an exhaust brake but none of the regular suppliers had one for it yet. Maybe if I stay out of the mountains I won't need one.

Pat
 
Last edited:
/ Hauling safety #26  
On engine size and safety, I have to disagree a little.

1. If your tow vehicle is so underpowerd that it cannot maintain highway speed (perhaps on the uphills), you become a hazard on the road when everybody else wants to pass you.

2. When your under-powered vehicle overheats or otherwise breaks down, you become a road-side hazard. For some unknown reason, inattentive drivers seem to hit vehicles on the shoulder a lot more than one would think would be statistically probable. I mean how often do you drive on the shoulder? Maybe its just habit of following other vehicles and your unconcious brain just steers into the shoulder thinking its following the stopped vehicle. Anyway, any time you are on the shoulder (out of gas, flat tire, overheated tow vehicle), you are increasing the risk of an accident.

Also, the larger engine does add a slight bit more weight to the tow vehicle, giving its steering wheels more traction, more braking, etc.

In general, I think that the ratio of tow vehicle weight to trailer weight is one of the largest factors. For example, pulling a 12,000 lb trailer with a 4,000 lb mini-pickup is a tail trying to wag a dog for sure. Up the tow vehicle to a 7000 lb 3/4-ton truck and it starts to be a bit more of an even match.

- Rick
 
/ Hauling safety #27  
keeney said:
On engine size and safety, I have to disagree a little.

1. If your tow vehicle is so underpowerd that it cannot maintain highway speed (perhaps on the uphills), you become a hazard on the road when everybody else wants to pass you.

2. When your under-powered vehicle overheats or otherwise breaks down, you become a road-side hazard. For some unknown reason, inattentive drivers seem to hit vehicles on the shoulder a lot more than one would think would be statistically probable. I mean how often do you drive on the shoulder? Maybe its just habit of following other vehicles and your unconcious brain just steers into the shoulder thinking its following the stopped vehicle. Anyway, any time you are on the shoulder (out of gas, flat tire, overheated tow vehicle), you are increasing the risk of an accident.

Also, the larger engine does add a slight bit more weight to the tow vehicle, giving its steering wheels more traction, more braking, etc.

In general, I think that the ratio of tow vehicle weight to trailer weight is one of the largest factors. For example, pulling a 12,000 lb trailer with a 4,000 lb mini-pickup is a tail trying to wag a dog for sure. Up the tow vehicle to a 7000 lb 3/4-ton truck and it starts to be a bit more of an even match.

- Rick

Rick, Sure can't argue with the concept of dangerously underpowered. At some point you are a hazard to navigation as HP/Weight ratio goes lower and lower. Now as far as maintaining highway speed on hills is concerned. An awful lot of 18 wheelers on the highway don't maintain the speed limit on hills and aren't particularly unsafe because of it. Our interstates are often posted at 70MPH but wisely also post minimum speeds of 45. (Referring to Oklahoma) If you can maintain 45 up a hill you are not in violation. I don't think overall public safety would be enhanced by encouraging everyone pulling a trailer to drive 70MPH.

If people are so immature that they are unable to control their emotions sufficiently while driving that they commit unsafe acts out of frustration because someone is trying to tow a load safely and are not making the upper speed limit then so be it. You can't always make everything perfect for the self important few who think everyone should stay of of their way. I for one don't want everyone towing a load to try to always maintain the max posted speed just to avoid inconveniencing some impatient immature driver.

Excellent point about how roadside objects (police giving tickets, trees, etc do get hit much more often than you'd think. A traffic engineer told me that one of their primary truths is that any roadside object will eventually get hit. Someone bobbles in traffic and goes on the shoulder a bit or even more AND it happens it is when you are stopped getting a ticket or waiting for your overheated vehicle to cool.... oops.

I was taught that when the fog gets too bad to safely continue driving that I should pull well off the roadway and turn off all the vehicles lights. The reason is that a lot of bozos when driving in reduced visibility try to tailgate someone closely enough to be able to follow them instead of guiding on the highway markings (which they can't see in the fog.) The result is that if you are parked with your lights on, by the time they realize they are overtaking you not just following you down the road, it is too late to react and you are hit in the rear.

As far as the weight of a larger engine making a big difference in the stability of a truck pulling a trailer goes... It is theoretically true but I doubt you could sense the difference.

About item 2. I have seen lots of truck-trailer combinations with rather low HP to weight ratios that were in excellent repair and were no more (and probably less) likely to overheat or breakdown than many much more powerful rigs. A lower HP/weight ratio is not a reliable indicator of probability of a breakdown. If that were the case the roadside would be littered with 18 wheelers awaiting assistance/repairs.

Of course there are limits of reasonableness. At some point a vehicle would be too underpowered to be practical or safe, irrespective of its mechanical condition or ability to operate without self damage. I in no way condone such vehicles venturing out into traffic to share the roads with us. On the other hand I don't think the minimum safe HP requirement is to be able at all times go up any grade with any load to maintain the max posted speed.

I live in a rural agricultural area and see lots of trucks pulling trailers. I very very seldom see a vehicle pulled off the road with a mechanical problem. When I venture into the city (OKC) I see more stranded cars in a day than I see stranded trucks with trailers in several months.

Pat
 
/ Hauling safety #28  
patrick_g said:
Again, diesels without variable valve timing Jake brakes (or exhaust brakes) do not offer as much "compression braking" as a gasser. At least that was conventional wisdom before I drove the new F-250 which apparently acts like the Soundguy's Ford. I guess we will have to investigate this.

I agree with your last sentence. I have always found my diesels slow way faster than any gas vehicles, both cars and trucks. I don't see how it's related to the intake as you mentioned earlier. To me, it all happens in the compression stroke, not the intake. When the wheels are powering the engine, a gas car is compressing 10:1 at most and a diesel is compressing at least twice that much. My F250 is an automatic. It slows down quick and when it's doing it it gets real quiet for a while and then the engine sound picks back up. My F450 does the same thing but it's a 6 speed. Both of them slow down way faster than the F350 gas that I replaced. It's not even close...
 
/ Hauling safety #30  
bjcsc said:
I agree with your last sentence. I have always found my diesels slow way faster than any gas vehicles, both cars and trucks. I don't see how it's related to the intake as you mentioned earlier. To me, it all happens in the compression stroke, not the intake.

The reason exhaust brakes are sold for retrofit onto diesel pickups and motorhomes (but to my knowledge not for gas engines) is because the diesels have nearly no compressive baking compared to the gas engines. The gas engine has a throttle that closes off the incoming air stream quite a bit when you go to idle. The pistons, on intake stroke, have to suck air through the orifice formed by the nearly closed air inlet. In the olden days it would have been a butterfly valve in a carburettor but the equivalent is still in use.

Diesel engines have NO CONTROL to limit intake air. The intake is wide open at all times. When you go to idle with a diesel the engine uses energy to compress the air on the compression stroke but gets most of that energy back on the power stroke (even though there is no extra energy from burning fuel) Then the exhaust valves open and the air is exhausted. There are frictional losses but otherwise there is no net loss of energy and the braking effect is small. The difference in braking effect is the gas engine sucking air in through a restriction when at idle position on the throttle. The diesel's higher compression doesn't really matter as it is getting back most of the energy put into compression at idle throttle setting.

Jake brakes (not normally found on a pickup) use variable valve timing such that the diesel engine so fitted is doing a lot of work compressing air but not getting any help back out of the compressed air. VERY EFFECTIVE braking when you make the engine into a big air compressor with no storage tank.

With an exhaust brake fitted the sequence is this: A butterfly valve in the exhaust closes (to a preset position to not float the valves with over pressure) and the exhaust has to go through an orifice/restriction which again uses the engine like an air compressor with good effect.

I have BD brand exhaust brake on my automatic Dodge/Cummins pickup and had I not had the heavy duty valve springs from the factory I would have had them put in so I could use higher pressures with the exhaust brake for better braking action. Braking action improves with RPM, of course, so you want to down shift and let the engine rev up for more effective braking (but of course not over reving.)

In mountain driving and or with heavy hauling, exhaust brakes are a terrific safety factor. Descending a grade with a heavily laden diesel and no exhaust brakes is a formula for disaster as you can overheat your friction brakes and get brake fade. Down shifting a diesel pickup on a steep downgrade when you have no exhaust brake only revs the engine and makes almost no discernible braking difference.

Now as regards the more recent Ford diesels... I don't know what is going on but they seem to have better engine braking than any other non-exhaust brake equipped diesels I have driven. Wasn't like that with my '84 Ford diesel F-250. Isn't like that with my Dodge/Cumins '97 Ram 3500. My curiosity will force me to investigate. I did search for an exhaust brake specified for the 2008 Powerstroke a few months back and did not find one.

BD Power - The Leaders in Diesel Performance
Banks Power – Exhaust Brake Systems: Why Add an Exhaust Brake to turbo diesel powered vehicles for supplemental engine exhaust braking.
Home - PacBrake - Exhaust and Engine Brakes for Automotive, Motorhome, Medium Duty and Heavy Duty Vehicles

Pat
 
/ Hauling safety #31  
A friend recently bought a 2008 Dodge diesel, and apparently they now have the same type of "engine braking" as Ford and GM have had for a few years. The "engine braking" is more like a locked torque converter with controlled exhaust back pressure, the computer controls application and is most noticeable when one takes a foot off the accelerator (no overt braking).

I suggested the Dodge have BrakeSmart, and much to my surprise the local dealer was able to install it in a few days-- I had expected it to be too exotic for these guys. Truck went down to Florida, don't know the owner's impression of the BrakeSmart (I don't have one, they did not make them back when I bought my truck). [BrakeSmart is a brake controller, and has a brake line pressure sensor intended to relieve the driver of having to adjust the controller for differing trailer weights]
 
/ Hauling safety #32  
My 2008 F-250 PowerStroke Diesel has a lot more braking effect then my Cumins 5.9 (when not using exhaust brake on Cumins) but I don't know why. It is especially noticeable when in tow/haul mode mostly, I think, due to aggressive shift pattern when in that mode.

Info on Ford's torqueshift transmission from another site

When in Tow/Haul: The torque converter clutch will lock up at a lower vehicle speed for a given accelerator pedal position to provide improved transmission cooling. It will also stay locked longer on deceleration to provide engine braking. Engine braking is also provided on deceleration through the coast clutch. On the older transmissions EPC would always be minimal with the accelerator in the idle or coast position. This would result in slippage during deceleration on steep down grades, especially with a load. When the Tow/Haul mode is selected on the TorqShift, the computer commands sufficent pressure to the apply components to prevent this slippage.

Finally, to help maintain vehicle speed when desending a grade and help increase brake pad longevity, the transmission will downshift automatically. If the computer senses vehicle speed increase with the accelerator released, it will downshift to the next lowest gear. If vehicle speed continues to increase, the computer will command the transmission to downshift again. The grade braking downshift mode will be deactivated if the Tow/Haul mode is deactivated or the accelerator is depressed.
 
/ Hauling safety #33  
jk96, Thanks for digging that up and sharing it. I made a cursory attempt to find the Ford specific info and struck out.

Everything you report sounds right except for something not mentioned. Since there is so little compression braking afforded by a diesel (with no engine break capabilities built in like with a Jake brake or an exhaust brake ) where does the retarding force come from?

I looked into 5-6 makers of exhaust brakes for diesel pickups and motorhomes. Not one lists an application for the 2008 6.4 liter Powerstroke. It isn't enough that it will be an engine only used for 2 years and then abandoned with all the parts and tech knowledge impacts that implies for the outyears but being prematurely obsoleted it will not attract as much aftermarket accessory attention either.

Thanks again for your post. What site did you find with the info?

Pat
 
/ Hauling safety #34  
patrick_g said:
Diesel engines have NO CONTROL to limit intake air. The intake is wide open at all times. When you go to idle with a diesel the engine uses energy to compress the air on the compression stroke but gets most of that energy back on the power stroke (even though there is no extra energy from burning fuel) Then the exhaust valves open and the air is exhausted. There are frictional losses but otherwise there is no net loss of energy and the braking effect is small. The difference in braking effect is the gas engine sucking air in through a restriction when at idle position on the throttle. The diesel's higher compression doesn't really matter as it is getting back most of the energy put into compression at idle throttle setting.

Pat

OK. Now I get it. Thanks for explaining it and it does make sense to me now. So our Ford diesel trucks must be approaching this from the back door, i.e. restricting the exhaust?
 
/ Hauling safety #35  
bjcsc said:
OK. Now I get it. Thanks for explaining it and it does make sense to me now. So our Ford diesel trucks must be approaching this from the back door, i.e. restricting the exhaust?

That is the part that bothers me. You can bet your bippy if Ford had an exhaust brake on there they would be screaming it in their advertisements. The description of how the Ford automagic tranny operates is pretty much how my aftermarket equipment has modified my Dodge/Cumins auto tranny so it will work with an exhaust brake.

Seems like Ford did everything to prep for an exhaust brake but didn't put it on, leaving that as an exercise for the owner (should someone offer that accessory for the 2008.)

I am still troubled as it bothers me to not know where the retarding force is coming from.

I would like an exhaust brake for my 2008 F-250 PowerStroke. There are exhaust brakes that modulate the exhaust restriction so they do not exceed the set pressure. They close off more at low RPM but less at higher RPM to not exceed the max desired back pressure when applied. This way you can adjust the max back pressure so as to not over power your valve springs.

I will have to check the Ford specs but hopefully I won't have to put in HD valve springs to get decent braking. Some Cumins came with HD and some with standard valve springs. Luckily mine came with the HD and I didn't have to change them to be compatible with high performance exhaust brakes. Exhaust brakes can make your regular friction brakes last much much longer and if you keep the vehicle for a long time the savings in brake jobs can pay for the exhaust brake. Safety is enhanced, especially for hilly driving or towing or hauling significant loads.

Pat
 
/ Hauling safety
  • Thread Starter
#36  
So.. where is the braking force coming from.. can;'t just be torque converter / gearing can it?.. It's quite noticeable..

Soundguy
 
/ Hauling safety #38  
Soundguy said:
So.. where is the braking force coming from.. can;'t just be torque converter / gearing can it?..

Soundguy

Beats me, but it's not the torque converter because my 450 does the same thing and it's a stick...
 
/ Hauling safety #39  
In tow/haul mode the fan clutch is supposed to lock when slowing down. If you're going at a high enough rpm it increases resistance quite a bit. Probably not nearly as much as an exhaust brake but it does help slow down.
 
/ Hauling safety #40  
JESSE1 said:
In tow/haul mode the fan clutch is supposed to lock when slowing down. If you're going at a high enough rpm it increases resistance quite a bit. Probably not nearly as much as an exhaust brake but it does help slow down.

I have the Horton electric clutch fan in my '97 Dodge/Cumins 1 ton. The fan freewheels until the temp kicks the T'stat and then you definitely hear the fan as it is quite aggressive compared to OEM. It will contribute to deceleration but not a whole lot (compared to exhaust brake.) Of course it is most effective at high RPM. There is an override switch so you can engage it irrespective of the temp. I suppose it could be wired to a relay and the exhaust brake to run the fan whenever the exhaust brake engages.

SOUNDGUY: bjcsc says not the TC since his manual does it too. I really would like to get the straight info on the 6.4 L 2008 Powerstroke.

jk96: Thanks for the link to 6.0 PS info. Interesting, but I'm not sure how much does or does not apply to the 6.4 L 2008 version.

Braking with friction brakes generates a lot of heat as kinetic energy is transformed to heat which is dissipated to the air flow. Braking by any other means will also generate just as much heat. ("Cap'n, I canno break the laws of physics!") An exhaust brake forces the exhaust stream through an orifice where frictional loses in turbulent flow generate heat. (Compressing the gas with the pistons while working against the exhaust brake heats it but letting it return to normal pressure cools it so that is a wash with no net heating.) If the braking is hydraulic in the auto tranny then the fluid will get all the heat that would have gone to the brakes for the same braking force/duration. On a long downgrade this would put a tremendous heat load on the tranny/oil cooler/whatever and is NOT LIKELY what is happening.

So we have a mystery. What is actually happening?
Can an exhaust brake be used on the 6.4 2008 PS?
Will it help?

Yet another one of those things that make you go hmmmm????

Pat
 

Marketplace Items

2011 FORD F-550 (INOPERABLE) (A55745)
2011 FORD F-550...
Dual Rear Wheel Axle (A59230)
Dual Rear Wheel...
SHOP TOOLS (A58214)
SHOP TOOLS (A58214)
2014 Chevrolet Tahoe SUV (A59231)
2014 Chevrolet...
7ft Pull-Behind Rake Tractor Attachment (A59228)
7ft Pull-Behind...
3410 (A47477)
3410 (A47477)
 
Top