I'll bet 100% of TBNers believe that driving sideways on a steep hill with a heavy load in the FEL held high is a recipe for a rollover. Most of us have some personal experience with tippy tractors that gave us a common-sense appreciation of the reality of this prediction.
Unfortunately, a lot of modern science doesn't allow this kind of experiential validity. And, historically, when ever scientists shook up the established modes of thinking, controversy ensued. Einstein was an unknown kid when he published his radical theories of relativity. Very few physicists accepted it: his reasoning was hard to follow and some of the predictions (the bending of light due to gravity, the absoluteness of the speed of light, relativity of time) were difficult if not impossible to test. But over time the controversy has died out as more and more repeatable results predicted by his arcane theories have been demonstrated.
Scientists still don't "understand" a lot of the paradoxes and weirdnesses of quantum mechanics, but it doesn't stop them from being true. The $600 laptop I'm typing this on has a hard drive made possible by paradoxical quantum behavior. Your's probably does, too.
Even if 100% of all people believed in God it wouldn't make it science, because it's not testable. Science is based on repeated testability with consistent results.
Climate change is very real. The evidence is overwhelming. As the planet heats up, some areas will get hotter and some will get colder. For example, as more polar ice melts significant amounts of cold fresh water will be carried on top of salt water in ocean currents, potentially cooling off places like Seattle and the UK that have mild climates because of warm ocean currents. These isolated changes don't by themselves mean the average temperature of the planet is not increasing. Thermometers tell us it is. Just as the oceans covering over 60% of the planet are absorbing significant amounts of excess CO2 from the atmosphere, but becoming more acidic in the process. pH meters tell us that.
I grew up in Tennessee when it was still illegal to teach evolution. It's amazing to me that people still want to debate this as a "theory" when the physical evidence is so overwhelming. When the consensus of serious scientists is so great. When the alternatives, while suitable as religious concepts, hardly qualify as science since they're not testable.
The "theories" of global warming/climate change and man's involvement in them are testable, fact-based, and agreed to by an overwhelming majority of the serious people who study this for a living. For someone like me (a layman, not a climatologist) to dispute this would be just plain ignorant. For an elected representative to do it based on the Bible is way beyond ignorant.
The problem with denying this is that the stakes are so high. If the 82% of climatologists who believe climate change is largely man-made are WRONG, then doing nothing will have no affect on global warming and we'll still be hosed. If, however, they're RIGHT, then doing nothing will be remembered by our grandchildren as one of the greatest screwups in history.
