Home Invasion...Short scary video...Be prepared...!

[weedpharma]

Not everyone thinks the same as you, and many of them don't mind saying so. That's usually thought of as a good thing in a democracy. We don't all have to agree. I am not hurting you by saying that you are wrong. If you find that offensive, maybe you should toughen up a bit..

I agree but from the other side of the discussion.

Weedpharma

 

[k0ua]

+1

Happy now k0ua?

Happy about what?

 

[weedpharma]

If you do not want guns in your home don't have them, if you do not like guns do not use them but please do not inflict your views on those of us who do by saying it is offensive to you so something we say or have in our sig must be removed. That is not right and just wrong everyone is entitled to an opinion just do not force it on those who disagree by saying it is not politically correct or it offends you. Just like a TV show you do not like cut it off, you do not offend anyone that way

In self defense of the above, I did not request the removal of the signature because of my views on firearms. The signature was offensive to some people for what it said.

The moderators have to treat all members equally.

My original signature was "When you understand why you dismiss other gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours"

This was ruled as religious discussion and removed.

Why should an insulting signature be allowed by another member??

Buppies quote applies just as equally to my original signature.

Weedpharma

 

[weedpharma]

Happy about what?

Early in this discussion you wanted to know when I would enter the discussion.

Weedpharma

 

[k0ua]

Early in this discussion you wanted to know when I would enter the discussion.

Weedpharma

You bet. I am really happy now!

 

[weedpharma]

You bet. I am really happy now!

I have been successful then!



Weedpharma

 

[Egbert]

"I know there is the Constitution that allows me to have my weapons backed up by the Supreme Court..."

This comment is naive on several levels.

First, the Constitution does NOT allow you to have weapons. NO RIGHTS are created by the Constitution. Your rights are inherent to your existence. Rights can be denied by man but not endowed by man. In short, the Constitution simply reiterates some of the more basic rights as a means of reinforcing their sanctity and as a warning to government they are off limits.

As for the Supreme Court, have you not heard of "packing the court?" This single issue is one of the most important factors in your deciding how to cast a presidential ballot. The judges on the SC will control your life for decades. When you can shove aboard the likes of Sotomayor and Kagin, freedom and liberty rapidly become subjective terms. Activists have little concern about the intent of the framers or the literal text of the Constitution. Need an example, probably the most disastrous attack on your freedom by the court in its existence, just look at how the Commerce Clause has been twisted to give the government unlimited power in unlimited circumstances. This single issue could negate everything you believe you know about America.

And, concerning the NRA - yes, they are dedicated to firearms rights. However, that issue is very much secondary to what they accomplish. In a nutshell, the Constitution is only useful as long as the 2nd Amendment is protected. By what means would you resist tyranny if firearms were confiscated. Uh, perhaps you should ask WWII German citizens. Registration precedes confiscation, and that is the ONLY reason government has to control/register/license/permit your ownership of firearms. Without the NRA, this battle would have been lost long ago.

 

[lilranch2001]

You bet. I am really happy now!

I'm not

 

[lilranch2001]

"I know there is the Constitution that allows me to have my weapons backed up by the Supreme Court..."

This comment is naive on several levels.

First, the Constitution does NOT allow you to have weapons. NO RIGHTS are created by the Constitution. Your rights are inherent to your existence. Rights can be denied by man but not endowed by man. In short, the Constitution simply reiterates some of the more basic rights as a means of reinforcing their sanctity and as a warning to government they are off limits.

As for the Supreme Court, have you not heard of "packing the court?" This single issue is one of the most important factors in your deciding how to cast a presidential ballot. The judges on the SC will control your life for decades. When you can shove aboard the likes of Sotomayor and Kagin, freedom and liberty rapidly become subjective terms. Activists have little concern about the intent of the framers or the literal text of the Constitution. Need an example, probably the most disastrous attack on your freedom by the court in its existence, just look at how the Commerce Clause has been twisted to give the government unlimited power in unlimited circumstances. This single issue could negate everything you believe you know about America.

And, concerning the NRA - yes, they are dedicated to firearms rights. However, that issue is very much secondary to what they accomplish. In a nutshell, the Constitution is only useful as long as the 2nd Amendment is protected. By what means would you resist tyranny if firearms were confiscated. Uh, perhaps you should ask WWII German citizens. Registration precedes confiscation, and that is the ONLY reason government has to control/register/license/permit your ownership of firearms. Without the NRA, this battle would have been lost long ago.

Well then......
It sure is good we have the NRA

Anyone who is not a member, this post proves you need to go join!

 

[k0ua]

I'm not

Notice the little blue rolleyes sarcasm guy on the end.