Charlie175
Gold Member
My mistake, not a MTD!
It's a start, so I won't knock it. Hopefully bigger and better things to come
It's a start, so I won't knock it. Hopefully bigger and better things to come
Why bring back the AC name only to put it on an entry level lawn mower? I hope they are going to go somewhere more with the AC name and release an entire line similar to Cub Cadet and John Deere where they have entry level mowers on up to high quality garden tractors.
It is nice to see the name and logo again though
BUT, for me, i still rather buy a used quality mower than a new More Trash from Detroit.......old saying we use to use when i worked at a troybilt dealership.....
Nice to see the name come back, but I gotta wonder why in blue thunder do they need 23 HP for a 42" deck?????
Bringing the Allis-Chalmers name back sounds like the same tactic cheap electronics makers do to capture the money of us older baby boomers who remember growing up with Packard-Bell, Admiral, Zenith, etc brands. The names are the same; but the company(s) behind the names aren't.
I think Joe and Kent are both right. But I mean.......23 HP for a 42-in. deck! I know mulching take more HP, but my JD Z425 has the same HP briggs on a 48-in. deck, and, it drives a power flow bagger fan. That soaks the HP, but it's still plenty on my mower, although I must say I have no hills to negotiate. Hp does sell, and they probably got a good deal on those Briggs models for production purposes. There was a thread on another forum discussing the year old class action suit, filed against the small engine mfrs in the outdoor power industry, for exaggerating HP figures. Maybe those aren't "realistic" HP figures??? Regardless, my old '87 MTD (Wards) cut tall grass just fine with a 11-HP Tecumseh and a 38-in. deck (not that much smaller deck). Hmmmm....