Iplayfarmer
Super Member
Pooh_Bear said:I drew this up in AutoDesk Inventor...
Perfect!
I wish I could afford the price of a good AutoCad type program like that and the time to learn how to use it well.
Pooh_Bear said:I drew this up in AutoDesk Inventor...
Spiveyman said:I'm not familiar with an angle grinder, does that work the same way a mitre saw works but for metals?
If you had done it my way you would be done by now!GT2 said:If I'm understanding correctly; Why dont you just cut them 60d and then v notch them so they will fit the corners of the center tube?
Spiveyman said:This has been bugging me all day. If you use a round leg, there's no "compounding" of the angle. In looking through the posts, GuglioLS already said that. Also, you said you kind of mocked one up and it turned out to be 35ー. If you used the same angles as in Pooh_Bear's drawing, (30ー & 40ー), but rotated the leg a bit you'd get that 35ー angle. That's the thing with the square leg, there's an infinite number of top/side angles that would position the leg where you wanted it, but each one would be rotated differently along the length of the leg. You have to figure out what orientation you want the square leg. That's where Pooh's drawing program comes in handy. You can rotate that sucker and pick what you like.
Still thinking like a carpenter - the rotation of the leg (around its axis) is important only if the upper corners of those legs have to meet a sheet metal cone that is slipped down over all three legs.Spiveyman said:... That's the thing with the square leg, there's an infinite number of top/side angles that would position the leg where you wanted it, but each one would be rotated differently along the length of the leg. You have to figure out what orientation you want the square leg. That's where Pooh's drawing program comes in handy.
Iplayfarmer said:In my perfect little world the sides of the leg would be plumb up and down.