LD1
Epic Contributor
Split brakes ain't gonna help there 80% of the time either.
Never said it would.
I use split brakes in place of a locker for those odd times. Like only one tire hung up (or in the air). And it works just as well as a locker. But I use brakes far more to keep the tractor in a straight line when rear blading on an angle. A locker wont do that.
I'll go you one better: Hitch those two tractors tail-to-tail and see which one makes it to their end of the field first. I bet it's the one using the locker...
I am betting it will be a stale mate. Two identical tractors, with even footing and traction (not one tire on ice other on pavement; rather similar between the two rears), and I doubt either one will move the other.
Done it several times with different equipment and vehicles. Most notably, I had a 85 dodge w350 power wagon. 33x12.50 mud tires and posi front AND rear. Chained to my brothers 89 F150 and street treads with open diffs. On a pretty hard packed gravel drive it was a stalemate.
Sure, I could pull alot harder than him. But not hard enough to overcome his dead weight back out of the two depressions he made when spinning tires.
It takes a pretty significant difference in equipment size or weight for it to not be a stalemate in my experience. Just because one may have more drawbar pulling power, doesnt mean its enough can overcome the other.
I think you guys are blowing this out of proportion. I am NOT saying that a locker isnt usefull. I am NOT saying that a locker doesnt increase pulling power. I am saying that in MY experience, the slight increase doesnt help me more times than it does. You guys are making it sound like hitting the locker and getting BOTH tires spinning suddenly increases traction by 2x's. But that just isnt the case in most circumstances. I think most of us here arent running big iron pulling 18' disc's. We are running small CUT's doing a variety of chores.