MossRoad
Super Moderator
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2001
- Messages
- 58,182
- Location
- South Bend, Indiana (near)
- Tractor
- Power Trac PT425 2001 Model Year
Thanks for the responses. Mossroad, great having somebody with one of these chiming in so quickly. I had thought I had seen a hydraulic mower on an articulating tractor at some point and double checked the Ventrac but found that they are belt driven. I checked out your site and some of your videos. Very cool machine and it looks like the equivalent specs on your PowerTrac run the bush hog very well on vegetation up to and beyond what I'd be taking on with my machine.
I have thought about and considered some of the safety concerns. I would undoubtedly be curling the mower and am quite aware that curling it inwards with the blades facing me is not a good not just for blades but flying debris as well. My initial thought for a solution is to set up the mount to where the full curl inwards would still keep the mower parallel with the ground surface while allowing the outward curl to point the business end of the mower away from me and the machine. This would also hopefully leave a good stopping point to level the mower with the ground as well. Though I wouldn't plan on riding the mower on the ground all the time I have had some concerns about getting too much weight of the machine on the mower from time to time as well. So some re-engineering of the caster set up would possibly be in order as well.
The heat concern makes sense but is a bit beyond my rudimentary knowledge of hydraulics to know 100% if there would be a potential issue at this point. Like I said I know that there are some very expensive flail mowers that are supposed to work out of the box on my machine. I doubt that there is any type of auxiliary cooler involved with these mowers but there is a gear drive on those mowers and I do wonder if that lessens the heat load on the hydraulics. Also I was not 100% sure why the manufacturer of the rotary cutter said I'd need a case drain to run their mower with a direct drive setup. I thought it had something to do with foaming of the hydraulic fluid but perhaps foaming and heat build up concerns are one in the same thing.
But then again I am not sure I am not exactly understanding what the difference in heat load would be on a Powertrac vs my machine though. Spec-wise the tank capacity the tank capacity is listed at 5.5 gallons on my machine. With all the super long hydraulic lines I would assume an excavator may have the potential to radiate heat a bit better then a Powertrac, but then again I guess there's a possibility that constantly pushing the fluid through the extra length of lines has the potential to build up more heat as opposed to shorter lines on Powertrac as well. I guess we can see that I'm getting a bit over my skis as far as my level of understanding of hydraulics is concerned though.
I don't know much about case drains. There are no case drains on any of the hydraulic motors (both implement and wheel motors) on the PT425 series. But there are case drains on the motors on some of the larger Power Trac models and attachments, as I recall.
I think it has to do with returning any fluid that leaks past the seals in the motor case back to the hydraulic reservoir. Some types of motors have them and some don't. I do not know why or why not.
If you got a Power Trac brush cutter for the 400 series machines, you'd not have to install a case drain line. Just two hoses, pressure in and return. Other makers may require a case drain.