Hydro vs Standard Shift?

Status
Not open for further replies.
   / Hydro vs Standard Shift? #81  
My second guess is that I should have read the remainder of this thread before replying...


That would have probably been the smart thing to do. You're in a post that is titled Hydro vs. Standard Shift. I wasn't talking about NASA I was talking about the debate of whether a hydro or a geared tractor is better and all of our "opinions" of such. I certainly wasn't making a statement about the world in general.
 
   / Hydro vs Standard Shift? #82  
Trev, much like your hydraulic pump that runs the various hydraulics on the tractor, a HST works virtually identical. When no load is placed on it as would be the case when the pedal is not depressed, the flow is bypassed. The same happens with your hydraulic circuit used to operate the loader. If I had a tractor that was operating a device 24/7 or 24 hours a day 7 days a week, I might choose to have a gear tractor and disconnect the hydraulic pump or better yet, get a dedicated device be it a pump, generator or what have you.
 
   / Hydro vs Standard Shift? #83  
</font><font color="blue" class="small">( my fingers just hopped on the keyboard )</font>

Hey Bill, maybe you should teach your fingers to read? /forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif
 
   / Hydro vs Standard Shift? #84  
<font color="blue"> that my fingers just hopped on the keyboard </font>
That's one of the reasons TBN allows people to edit their own posts. /forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif
 
   / Hydro vs Standard Shift? #85  
"Maybe one of mine is that I am not going to own a tractor that you have to run at near full throttle all of the time and listen to the noise. I do understand why several times member here have talked about hearing protection. That is one of the reasons that I won't own a hydro. "


Jerry, it would seem that this is not accurate. Do you know of a tractor with HST that demands near full throttle to operate? I know that my experience with my Kubota, this is not accurate. I can in fact from my use of my tractor in my opinion, operate it at any RPM and have yet to ever need full throttle. Generally, I use 1800 to 2000 RPM unless mowing and then its at about 2300 RPM. I find 2300 RPM to be a great compromise in that the cut is not noticeably different then at 2600 RPM, the RPM required to develop 540 RPM at the PTO. The JD compacts do not require this as has been illustrated by Rockyridge in the JD forum. It makes me curious as to which tractor brand your familiar with that is operated in the manner to which you posted, that is near full throttle.

I often use hearing protection while mowing. I hear more noise from my mower and it's medium lift blades then the engine. I hear no hydrostatic whine unless in high range and in a high rolling resitance situation. I do not mow in high, as medium has a range of up to 7 mph at PTO speed. I typically mow at 3.6 to 4.3 mph. PTO RPM is typically at 477 to 503 RPM. I'm sure others have various needs and use their tractors differently, that stands to reason. My International, a gear tractor is run at 2000 RPM while mowing, I use 3rd or 4th gear. The engine on it is considerably louder and I attribute that to it's older design. Hearing protection on it is really recommeded. This is purely my experience and may not be relative or the experience you or others have. Rat... /forums/images/graemlins/wink.gif
 
   / Hydro vs Standard Shift? #86  
</font><font color="blue" class="small">( I Just found this Site and am SO happy to have found it before purchased.
)</font>

I am glad you found it too /forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif Sure created some good reading.. /forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif

Who makes the best hydro /forums/images/graemlins/confused.gif....Kubota/John Deere or New Holland ???? /forums/images/graemlins/tongue.gif nyuk,nyuk,nyuk nyuk...
 
   / Hydro vs Standard Shift? #87  
Oh man, your asking for it. /forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif You must be one of those rebel rousers.

Moderator, moderator, Country Boy needs some moderating /forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif
 
   / Hydro vs Standard Shift? #88  
I don't know, just asking, but isn't most Kubotas diesel? If so that would tell you, that it can be run at a lower rpm and still work good. So if that is so, then you would have good results at just about any rpm.
 
   / Hydro vs Standard Shift? #89  
When I first cam over here I heard lots on negative things about censoreing. After being gone for 24 hours due to the power black outs and comeing back to this I think the moderators are definately needed here. There are more than a few veiled antagonists on this strand, well, they actually seem to post thay way regularly as if giveing missleading info to a new comer is humorous. In short I think Cowboy doc was right in the 10 ring. I think we all need to remember what is best for the other person is not always best for you. That is a individual choice and that is part of the fun of a CUT. Skeptic had it right as well. Some of you have talked about fuel consumption and your individual very nominal useage. remeber that the next person may put on several hundred hours a year. Noise, what is tolerable to one is unbearable to another. Some feel that the FEL difference with a hydro is laughable, well for you it might be, again the individual might find that a huge difference. Someone posted a 1k repair on the Hydro Vs $700 for a clutch. I assure you folks that there are a whole lot of people out there that consider that a BIG price difference. Not everyones pockets are bulgeing with that extra $. Someone said a Hydro will or will not be more $ to repair and then said they had no info ? I'm still stumpted on the logic there. Some came to the party late and then said ooops I should have read. hmmm. Maybe we could just think of this in terms of helping some one new out with some base info and get by with a little less ego inflated chest beating. Good Grief /forums/images/graemlins/confused.gif
 
   / Hydro vs Standard Shift? #90  
Doc, I take it from your comment your not a big fan of exchanging information and perhaps informing those who might have believed something to be one way, when another view is presented that contradicts that as my opinion of JerryG's. Reread JerryG's, and judge for yourself just how accurate you judge it to be. If you agree that a HST needs to be run at near full RPM in order to work, fine, your entitled to that opinion. Am I not entiltled to question it, I think I am. If thats being an antogonist, then I'm the leader and very proud of it regardless of how someone else feels about it. If everyone went on believing that a HST needed to be operated at full RPM when in my opinion it does not and the JD manual also states, then where is the value in that?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

2011 CATERPILLAR D9T HI-TRACK CRAWLER DOZER (A51242)
2011 CATERPILLAR...
2017 Ford F-250 Ext. Cab Pickup Truck (A50323)
2017 Ford F-250...
10' Poly Feed Trough (A50515)
10' Poly Feed...
(4) Stand Alone Texas Panels (A50515)
(4) Stand Alone...
BUNDLE OF GALVANIZED CORRUGATED METAL SHEETS (A51244)
BUNDLE OF...
New Holland B95 Backhoe (A50490)
New Holland B95...
 
Top