Hydro vs Standard Shift?

Status
Not open for further replies.
   / Hydro vs Standard Shift? #71  
CountryBoy, just what this place needed /forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif

Of course, I'm getting it now here in CA., you know the Grey Davis VS Arnold thing or the pastey ferret vs the Terminator. It's fun! /forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif Rat...
 
   / Hydro vs Standard Shift? #72  
<font color="blue"> The reason it gives the rpm at 2000 up is because of it being a gas engine. They have to have higher rpms to have power. Now a diesel gets its power at a much lower rpm, so you could run it at a lower rpm and still have the power. </font>

Very good point and I agree completely. However, I'd still like to know what the owner's manuals for modern CUTS say about operating RPMs and HST. Mine's pretty specific.
 
   / Hydro vs Standard Shift? #73  
I wasn't shooting anything at you Rat. I was just trying to say that your or my opinion is just that. Somebody else operating the same piece of machinery may have a completely different outlook on the equipment than you or I do. It's yours, mine, Moss's, etc. etc.'s take on how that equipment operates. It isn't right or wrong and it certainly has nothing to do with fact or reaching any kind of consensus. I didn't mean that post to be directed at you or anybody else. It was just a blanket statement as to why there is no consensus. Don't take it personally. It wasn't meant to be any kind of an attack or "zinger".
 
   / Hydro vs Standard Shift? #74  
What is the largest HP anyone has seen in the HST tractor.. I know they have shuttle shift on some of the big boys.. but what's the HP limit for the HST? Are any of big construction loaders HST?
 
   / Hydro vs Standard Shift? #75  
</font><font color="blue" class="small">( think Yanmar's "powershift" trans. beats the pants off it in every respect. )</font>

Just as soon as you get used to the feeling of a steering wheel getting jabbed into your gut when you shift directions....
 
   / Hydro vs Standard Shift? #76  
If you have a tractor which is sitting motionless running nothing but its rear PTO (for example, running a generator 24x7 during a power outage) I've been told you're much better off with a gear tranny.. otherwise the HST fluid would be pumping the entire time. With a gear trans in the same situation, just shut down, change oil and filters, and bring it back up.

Question: Is this basically true, or was I fed a line? /forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif
 
   / Hydro vs Standard Shift? #77  
Yep very lively,
My final opinion on this thread. If you are planning on trading your tractor in on a new one in several years and aren't planning on using it primarially for draft type of work then a Hydro is ok. If like me you plan on keeping a tractor, then a gear type will be the most reliable and cheapest to maintain over the long haul. Plus the gear ones don't seem to have computer controls for the transmission, something else to break. I like my tractors as simple as possible to get the job done this equals greater reliability and less expense to maintain, plus I can fix it myself.

With that said I do agree that the Hydro's are easier to use and nice for loader operations. Plus the ability to adjust your groundspeed without having to manually shift gears is handy, of course this falls under easier to use /forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif
 
   / Hydro vs Standard Shift? #78  
dont forget saftey[hst will provide] or savings on the hour meter because the hst can do some stuff alot faster.i would not stand in front of a gear tractor with my wife on it and she is the only one to help me when i,m loading stuff or doing chain work with the loader.jmho bws ps i would like to think that the new chevy duramax would be my last truck but i know it probably wont be so would i buy a more simplified truck for longevity,probably not.i want a new duramax with all the gadgets.bws
 
   / Hydro vs Standard Shift? #79  
I might as well weigh-in here too /forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif
One consideration is how many drivers of different experience will be using the tractor. When I had my mom try out the clutch and the HST before I bought... well, there was no doubt the HST won. /forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif
So while there are benefits both ways... one consideration is that others may be driving the CUT while you are doing other things (I know... loss of seat time /forums/images/graemlins/blush.gif ). There are times that I want someone on the tractor as I rig up something to move or times that I am cutting wood and someone is using the FEL to move the cut wood elsewhere.
So beyond the gear/HST argument... Ford/Chevy, Mac/PC, Coke/Pepsi look beyond just yourself as a driver and what training you might have to give that extra hand. /forums/images/graemlins/smirk.gif
 
   / Hydro vs Standard Shift? #80  
<font color="blue"> It's not easy because everything is speculation and personal bias and opinion. Things are stated as fact when they are not. It's opinion that you can run your tractor at lower rpms but the manual and other owners disagree. </font>

I don't mean to fuel the fire, but everything is not speculation...for example, if you have a manual that states that a specific tractor needs to always be run at full, rated rpm, why not just quote it? No speculation involved then right?

As a matter of fact, my tractor manuals both specifically state not to run at full rated rpm for the first 50 hours...I suppose I should quote that myself! How could I get that many hours on my tractor without using it with manufacturer approval at lower than rated rpm?

It sure would be helpful when any of us make statements, that we back them up with some reference, or simply state it is our opinion without any experience or data to back it up.

Perhaps if we made it a practice to start posts [when it applies] with a disclaimer, something like " I have no experience or any data to back up what I am claiming..." we might just end up finding that we post a little less... /forums/images/graemlins/blush.gif

Cowboydoc, do you really believe what you wrote?:

<font color="blue"> It's not easy because everything is speculation and personal bias and opinion. </font>

If so I am glad for the astrounauts you don't work for NASA!

My guess, however, is that you were referring to this thread and some of the comments made here, rather than to reality in general... /forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif

My second guess is that I should have read the remainder of this thread before replying...but the statements in your post were so different from my experience that my fingers just hopped on the keyboard /forums/images/graemlins/blush.gif /forums/images/graemlins/blush.gif /forums/images/graemlins/blush.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

80in HD Tooth Bucket with Side Cutters ONE PER LOT (A51039)
80in HD Tooth...
2017 Ford F-350 Ext. Cab Pickup Truck (A49461)
2017 Ford F-350...
2015 Ford Explorer AWD SUV (A50324)
2015 Ford Explorer...
BACK BUMPER (A49461)
BACK BUMPER (A49461)
2019 CHEVY 5500 CAB CHASSIS (A50505)
2019 CHEVY 5500...
2013 AMSIG S/A Solar Towable Message Board (A50322)
2013 AMSIG S/A...
 
Top