Hydrostatic vs Non

   / Hydrostatic vs Non #102  
If you are trying to decide between a hydrostatic and gear transmission for your tractor, think of the letter "L", when it comes to when the hydro is better: 1) Lawnmowing 2) Loader work 3) Landscaping 4) Ladies 5) Lazy folks.

If you or your usage don't fall into those 5 categories then you might be best served with a gear transmission.
 
   / Hydrostatic vs Non #103  
If you are trying to decide between a hydrostatic and gear transmission for your tractor, think of the letter "L", when it comes to when the hydro is better: 1) Lawnmowing 2) Loader work 3) Landscaping 4) Ladies 5) Lazy folks.

If you or your usage don't fall into those 5 categories then you might be best served with a gear transmission.

Add no Left leg fatigue. :)
 
   / Hydrostatic vs Non #104  
Got to love the whining noise and extra heat from a HST. I own two and jumping on one of my antique gear tractors is pure pleasure. Just got a new Kubota yesterday, you would think with today's technology HST would be more quiet.
 
   / Hydrostatic vs Non #105  
My tractor is used mainly as a loader , off road fork lift . I couldn't imagine driving a manual in and out of all the tight spaces on my property and control a load. we have a manual nursery fork lift at our shop and I avoid it like the plague. {clutch is iffy , brakes work some times] that don't help.:drink:
 
   / Hydrostatic vs Non #106  
If you are trying to decide between a hydrostatic and gear transmission for your tractor, think of the letter "L", when it comes to when the hydro is better: 1) Lawnmowing 2) Loader work 3) Landscaping 4) Ladies 5) Lazy folks.

If you or your usage don't fall into those 5 categories then you might be best served with a gear transmission.

so you are saying your Hydro toy gets you more ladies than your STick? Makes sense. Gotta run. It's beer time on the ponderosa.
 
   / Hydrostatic vs Non #107  
Got to love the whining noise and extra heat from a HST. I own two and jumping on one of my antique gear tractors is pure pleasure. Just got a new Kubota yesterday, you would think with today's technology HST would be more quiet.

Mine is.
 
   / Hydrostatic vs Non #108  
Got to love the whining noise and extra heat from a HST. I own two and jumping on one of my antique gear tractors is pure pleasure. Just got a new Kubota yesterday, you would think with today's technology HST would be more quiet.

Mine quieted down considerably when I upgraded to the Super UDT hydro fluid at my 400 hour maintenance... at about 25 bucks/gallon. I bought the tractor used with 180 hours so have no idea what was in it before.
 
   / Hydrostatic vs Non #109  
If you are trying to decide between a hydrostatic and gear transmission for your tractor, think of the letter "L", when it comes to when the hydro is better: 1) Lawnmowing 2) Loader work 3) Landscaping 4) Ladies 5) Lazy folks.

If you or your usage don't fall into those 5 categories then you might be best served with a gear transmission.

:thumbsup::drink::salute:
 
   / Hydrostatic vs Non #110  
Mine quieted down considerably when I upgraded to the Super UDT hydro fluid at my 400 hour maintenance... at about 25 bucks/gallon. I bought the tractor used with 180 hours so have no idea what was in it before.

This is a LX2610 and it ships with Super UDT2. Manual says filter changes at 50 - 200 - 400 hours but oil doesn't get changed until 400. Same tractor as B2650 and it looks like others indicate HST noise.
 
   / Hydrostatic vs Non #111  

Noticed your tractor is a larger compact. I also have a Kubota L4330 that the HST is quiet. It's more of a small tractor HST issue. I had a 27 HP LS J2030H (NH Boomer 25), just traded in, that also made more HST noise than the larger tractor. Maybe the larger mass dampens the noise better.
 
   / Hydrostatic vs Non #112  
Noticed your tractor is a larger compact. I also have a Kubota L4330 that the HST is quiet. It's more of a small tractor HST issue. I had a 27 HP LS J2030H (NH Boomer 25), just traded in, that also made more HST noise than the larger tractor. Maybe the larger mass dampens the noise better.

Yes, that is been my experience as well. The larger the tractor, the quieter the hydro. I think it may have something to do with the size of the passages that the oil flows thru. But I can't prove that. I run SUDT2 in my tractor as well.
 
   / Hydrostatic vs Non #113  
If you are trying to decide between a hydrostatic and gear transmission for your tractor, think of the letter "L", when it comes to when the hydro is better: 1) Lawn mowing 2) Loader work 3) Landscaping 4) Ladies 5) Lazy folks.

If you or your usage don't fall into those 5 categories then you might be best served with a gear transmission.
Now that's funny :D :cool2:(...and true!) I fit in 4 out of 5 and the one I don't fit in, my wife really wanted to be able to use the tractor every now and then... (so glad she spoke up, I was aiming to get a gear transmission).
 
   / Hydrostatic vs Non #114  
Now that's funny :D :cool2:(...and true!) I fit in 4 out of 5 and the one I don't fit in, my wife really wanted to be able to use the tractor every now and then... (so glad she spoke up, I was aiming to get a gear transmission).

It is for sure. I had never used a hydro, until about 15 years ago, when my brother in law gave me his old Ingersol Lawn-mower tractor. After using that, I could never go back to a gear tractor for that regular usage. I do keep a gear lawnmower around, for when the grass gets too thick and I can't afford to loose the efficiency, but 95 % of the time I cut my acre of grass with a hydro. I blew the engine in the Ingersol after a couple years and have had (2) more hydros since then. The John Deere LT150 that I use now and was given to me by another brother in law, is still going strong.

As far as the loader work goes, I don't do a whole lot of it, and I get by ok with a "power-reverser" JD 4120 at home. That is basically a gear transmission that you don't need to clutch. The Case 580C hydro TLB, that I used at work, was much nicer for that. Landscaping is about half loader work and half lawn mowing, so the hydro is definitely better there. Some day, I might try and get our 16 year old girls to help with the lawn mowing, but I would never attempt it with a gear-drive. There is certainly more physical effort involved in using that.
 
   / Hydrostatic vs Non #115  
Originally Posted by Mat4644
Got to love the whining noise and extra heat from a HST. I own two and jumping on one of my antique gear tractors is pure pleasure. Just got a new Kubota yesterday, you would think with today's technology HST would be more quiet.



So is mine. M59 Kubota.
 
   / Hydrostatic vs Non #116  
I see this is an older debate. I知 not brand loyal or transmission loyal. Doubt I get the hours on any compared to many on here. But I. I壇 work in logging industry for a while. The equipment takes as much or more abuse than a farm tractor and most of that equipment was hst. I壇 haul 5 cords of wood over stumps on mountainsides and the hst was never an issue .
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

2013 Freightliner CASCADIA DAY CAB (A59575)
2013 Freightliner...
2014 Chevrolet Silverado 4x4 Crew Cab Pickup Truck (A56858)
2014 Chevrolet...
Massey Ferguson 4608 (A53317)
Massey Ferguson...
2010 CATERPILLAR 320DL RR EXCAVATOR (A60429)
2010 CATERPILLAR...
2004 FORD F-350 SUPER DUTY (INOPERABLE) (A58214)
2004 FORD F-350...
2017 Ford Explorer AWD SUV (A59231)
2017 Ford Explorer...
 
Top