smstonypoint
Super Member
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2009
- Messages
- 5,820
- Location
- SC (Upstate) & NC (Piedmont)
- Tractor
- NH TN 55, Kubota B2320 & RTV 900, Bad Boy Outlaw ZTR
Lots of speculation there, I'd be interested in the stats. I tend to believe that folks without a brain bucket tend to spill them everywhere, and end up costing less. People with helmets could actually end up costing more because they die less, but are still exposed to serious spinal and internal injuries, concussive brain trauma, etc. But that's also just an opinion.
I'd never ride on the roads without a helmet (sometimes putt around the yard on my quad without one), but generally don't support helmet laws. As scoutcub mentioned, no lid is the norm in Ohio...by a huge margin.
Aside from the personal freedom issue, another argument against mandatory safety devices (e.g., helmet and seat belt laws) is that people feel safer when they use those devices and thus take more risks than they would otherwise.
There is an extensive literature on the economic impact of helmet laws. I'm not familiar with that literature, but here's the abstract of one such study.
This paper reviews economic evaluations of motorcycle helmet interventions in preventing injuries. A comprehensive literature review focusing on the
effectiveness of motorcycle helmet use, and on mandatory helmet laws and their enforcement was done. When helmet laws were lifted between 1976-80, 48 states within the USA experienced a cost of $342,047 per excess fatality of annual net savings. Helmet laws in the USA had a benefit-cost ratio of 1.33 to 5.07. Taiwan witnessed a 14% decline in motorcycle fatalities and a 22% reduction of head injury fatalities with the introduction of a helmet law. In Thailand, where 70-90% of all crashes involve motorcycle, after enforcement of a helmet law, helmet-use increased five-fold, the number of injured motorcyclists decreased by 33.5%, head injuries decreased by 41.4%, and deaths decreased by 20.8%. There is considerable evidence that mandatory helmet laws with enforcement alleviate the burden of traffic injuries greatly. For low and middle-income countries with high rates of motorcycle injuries, enforced, mandatory motorcycle helmet laws are potentially one of the most cost-effective interventions available. Asia Pac J Public Health 2007; 19(2): 16?2.
Exploring the Economics of Motorcycle Helmet Laws ? Implications for Low and Middle-Income Countries ? Asia Pac J Public Health
Again, I'm not familiar with the literature and there may be studies that do not support the adoption of mandatory helmet laws.
Steve