You won't refute my statements because it's uncomfortable. I understand. Been there.
Refute what? Dial back to where I responded, it was CLEARLY in regard to your attitude to physics and the impossible perpendicular descent, and my mistake to think on you as an engineer ... which your next response was not intelligible for having little bearing as to why you though 90 degree was impossible.
I realise cutting back my first response was well justified, as I don't think you really understand even what maths physics concept I thought you might be leaning towards.
I know very well now - what you are doing "as a tactic" is probably what you've done your life as an engineer, (well employed as such) side step, divert and create new issues to keep people's attentions diverted ... and no doubt you got promoted upwards and sideways.
Even taking time to finally clarify what you meant, simply furthered the little show you're running. almost every claimed meteor impact to be at a 90 degree angle. Had you been clearer for a start, you'd had little argument - I would say many like myself were more interested in why perpendicular was improbable.
At this point though, if it's not a semi serious or interesting engineering based musing, and not throw away comments like "That's just simple logic." which don't cut it as any sort of response as a proof or explanation as to why you think it's virtually impossible, I'll be leaving you to your own thoughts. I don't have any need to talk cats, why they aren't all the same colours etc.
BTW I would suggest you at least have the courtesy to read some posts, there's a good one above why there isn't much of the meteor left, but physics doesn't scare you so I guess you don't need to worry about it.