Bob_Skurka
Super Member
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2003
- Messages
- 7,615
<font color="blue"> what we have going here is an unscientific argument at best. </font>
Yea, but wouldn't it be nice to finally see 2 roughly equal loaders of different design compared side to side on the same piece of ground with the perspective taken from the same viewing level?
Realistically, I think any reasonably capable person can easily use any brand of loader, regardless of the design (Heck, I've used a bunch of different types and haven't killed anyone yet and rarely destroy anything). The added value of the curved loader arms as I portray them is a very reasonable thing to question. I know after using both I am sold on the curved style. But just because one is better for some people does not mean the other is obsolete or unusable. On the other hand, people who've never tried the new style units really don't know what they are missing because they are absolutely correct in saying what they have works.
I'm thinking of laying down some chalk lines on my driveway or maybe some strings on a flat part of my land and seeing what I can or can't see from the drivers seat. I know what I like, based on using both, but it would be nice to either prove me right or prove me wrong (and shut me up) on this issue . . . in a totally objective manner, using 2 loaders that are basic equals in terms of capacity.
The two tractors/loaders I'm planning on lining up are sitting at home. The TC24 has a breakout force of 1720# and lift of 1090# while the B2910 has a breakout force of 1684# and lift of 1060#, and those are so darn close in actual numbers that I think it is pretty fair to say that they are statistical equals. The B2910 has a long flat hood and square loader arms. The TC24 has the curved arms and curved & sloped hood. The B2910 has a 60" bucket, the TC24 has a 54", I am not sure the height of either bucket, but a taller bucket would increase visibility of the bucket but not visibility of objects in front of the tractor/bucket.
Yea, but wouldn't it be nice to finally see 2 roughly equal loaders of different design compared side to side on the same piece of ground with the perspective taken from the same viewing level?
Realistically, I think any reasonably capable person can easily use any brand of loader, regardless of the design (Heck, I've used a bunch of different types and haven't killed anyone yet and rarely destroy anything). The added value of the curved loader arms as I portray them is a very reasonable thing to question. I know after using both I am sold on the curved style. But just because one is better for some people does not mean the other is obsolete or unusable. On the other hand, people who've never tried the new style units really don't know what they are missing because they are absolutely correct in saying what they have works.
I'm thinking of laying down some chalk lines on my driveway or maybe some strings on a flat part of my land and seeing what I can or can't see from the drivers seat. I know what I like, based on using both, but it would be nice to either prove me right or prove me wrong (and shut me up) on this issue . . . in a totally objective manner, using 2 loaders that are basic equals in terms of capacity.
The two tractors/loaders I'm planning on lining up are sitting at home. The TC24 has a breakout force of 1720# and lift of 1090# while the B2910 has a breakout force of 1684# and lift of 1060#, and those are so darn close in actual numbers that I think it is pretty fair to say that they are statistical equals. The B2910 has a long flat hood and square loader arms. The TC24 has the curved arms and curved & sloped hood. The B2910 has a 60" bucket, the TC24 has a 54", I am not sure the height of either bucket, but a taller bucket would increase visibility of the bucket but not visibility of objects in front of the tractor/bucket.