Bob_Young
Veteran Member
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2002
- Messages
- 1,244
- Location
- North of the Fingerlakes - NY
- Tractor
- Ford 4000; Ford 2000(both 3cyl.);JD40; 2004 Kubota L4300; 2006 Kubota B7610; new 2007 Kubota MX5000
Thanks, D., that second picture answers the question of the earlier thread.
E-PTO is a neat idea and I hope the competition catches on to it. One of the good things about diesels, as I understand, is that they pretty much burn just enough fuel to deliver the power demanded. A 90HP diesel doing work that only demands 50HP, will burn about the same fuel as a 50HP diesel doing the same work. So going smaller only saves the fuel that would be burned in hauling the extra weight of the larger tractor around. They're not like a gasoline engine that's highly dependent on a particular air/fuel mixture to run right and thus larger displacement at a given RPM automatically means greater fuel consumption, whether working hard or not.
Of course the demands of the new emission controls may mess this up. Don't understand how the geniuses behind controlling emissions can sacrifice fuel economy in the name of lowered emissions and view it as a net gain. This seems to be what's happened with the diesel pickups. May be a subject for a seperate thread.
Bob
E-PTO is a neat idea and I hope the competition catches on to it. One of the good things about diesels, as I understand, is that they pretty much burn just enough fuel to deliver the power demanded. A 90HP diesel doing work that only demands 50HP, will burn about the same fuel as a 50HP diesel doing the same work. So going smaller only saves the fuel that would be burned in hauling the extra weight of the larger tractor around. They're not like a gasoline engine that's highly dependent on a particular air/fuel mixture to run right and thus larger displacement at a given RPM automatically means greater fuel consumption, whether working hard or not.
Of course the demands of the new emission controls may mess this up. Don't understand how the geniuses behind controlling emissions can sacrifice fuel economy in the name of lowered emissions and view it as a net gain. This seems to be what's happened with the diesel pickups. May be a subject for a seperate thread.
Bob