Harvest Moon
Gold Member
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2007
- Messages
- 357
- Tractor
- Kubota L3400 HST-F
One of the reasons I haven't aggressively pursued getting my valve replaced is descriptions like ccsial's. If I were to do the ruler test without an implement I'm pretty sure that I'd get 1/4 inch increments but throw an implement on and my tractor gets thrown around like the ones shown in the bad 3 pt videos that have been posted.
I know my valve is the original faulty old style but I'm not sure if pursuing replacement is worth the trouble. It really doesn't do 1" increments at the lift arms but the implement will jerk up and down in a range of at least one inch depending on it's projection.
I've read un clarified references referring to this problem and a "cushion valve", sometimes referring to the upgraded control valve and other times referring to something different all together... that no one seems to know about.
Thing is, it seems like my valve would be fine with a little "cushion" and it works pretty good without and implement but boy can it jerk my 4500 lbs. worth of tractor, filled tires and loader around with a 400 lb box blade on it.
I just don't understand how this can be soooo complicated, nor how Kubota can fight about it. I've seen, used and even owned tractors about 50 years old and older that have position control style hydraulic components that are butter smooth or close to it. It's not like this is ground breaking technology.
Why pick a fight with your customers, why produce something so non competitive that it's actually an embarrassment? And then fight some more?
Then fix it, then break it, then fight about it some more?
I know my valve is the original faulty old style but I'm not sure if pursuing replacement is worth the trouble. It really doesn't do 1" increments at the lift arms but the implement will jerk up and down in a range of at least one inch depending on it's projection.
I've read un clarified references referring to this problem and a "cushion valve", sometimes referring to the upgraded control valve and other times referring to something different all together... that no one seems to know about.
Thing is, it seems like my valve would be fine with a little "cushion" and it works pretty good without and implement but boy can it jerk my 4500 lbs. worth of tractor, filled tires and loader around with a 400 lb box blade on it.
I just don't understand how this can be soooo complicated, nor how Kubota can fight about it. I've seen, used and even owned tractors about 50 years old and older that have position control style hydraulic components that are butter smooth or close to it. It's not like this is ground breaking technology.
Why pick a fight with your customers, why produce something so non competitive that it's actually an embarrassment? And then fight some more?
Then fix it, then break it, then fight about it some more?