L39

I don't have the quick coupler bucket, just the 18" that came with the machine. I racked the bucket and bent the side. Our weld shop fixed and reinforced the edges. My teeth are already getting banged up.

Have a few very small dings in hood. Broke the tail-light lens on a leaning tree that just caught the edge, and put a 1-1/2 hole in the grill.

I need skypups grill guard.

I keep the machine greased. Use at least half a tube each 12-15 hours, more often in dusty conditions

Under the right circumstances the loader will just barely lift he rear end off the ground. I was picking up a 7' root ball and it got scary.

I still say the bucket curl is weak compared to the rest of the machine.

I wish the machine had another 25 or so hp and weighed +10K lbs, was 6 " wider in track, and had 12.5 x 18 front tires, 17.5 X 24 rears but otherwise not more than a bit physically larger than it now is.

I would not want a full size TLB, just one almost as strong.
 
I don't have the quick coupler bucket, just the 18" that came with the machine. I racked the bucket and bent the side. Our weld shop fixed and reinforced the edges. My teeth are already getting banged up.

Have a few very small dings in hood. Broke the tail-light lens on a leaning tree that just caught the edge, and put a 1-1/2 hole in the grill.

I need skypups grill guard.

I keep the machine greased. Use at least half a tube each 12-15 hours, more often in dusty conditions

Under the right circumstances the loader will just barely lift he rear end off the ground. I was picking up a 7' root ball and it got scary.

I still say the bucket curl is weak compared to the rest of the machine.

I wish the machine had another 25 or so hp and weighed +10K lbs, was 6 " wider in track, and had 12.5 x 18 front tires, 17.5 X 24 rears but otherwise not more than a bit physically larger than it now is.

I would not want a full size TLB, just one almost as strong.
 
You my friend, have just described an L48 /forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif
 
You my friend, have just described an L48 /forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif
 
</font><font color="blue" class="small">(
I wish the machine had another 25 or so hp and weighed +10K lbs, was 6 " wider in track, and had 12.5 x 18 front tires, 17.5 X 24 rears but otherwise not more than a bit physically larger than it now is.

I would not want a full size TLB, just one almost as strong.
)</font>

Here ya go. 67HP, fairly compact about twice as strong as an L-39 with full size TLB dig features:

http://www.jcb.com/(g5cbltz1wc0lkf55bblvk4zj)/products/productdetail.aspx?pid=110&rid=14
 
</font><font color="blue" class="small">(
I wish the machine had another 25 or so hp and weighed +10K lbs, was 6 " wider in track, and had 12.5 x 18 front tires, 17.5 X 24 rears but otherwise not more than a bit physically larger than it now is.

I would not want a full size TLB, just one almost as strong.
)</font>

Here ya go. 67HP, fairly compact about twice as strong as an L-39 with full size TLB dig features:

http://www.jcb.com/(g5cbltz1wc0lkf55bblvk4zj)/products/productdetail.aspx?pid=110&rid=14
 
Your correct, I have no L48 experience, and my only experience with hydro was on a 37 hp Deere, 3700 something. The l48 must push into a pile nice in low range.

Compared to an L39, a 8000 lb machine will have more push than a 7000 lb machine. Specs and the people I have spoken to who ran both machines say there is not a lot of BH difference between the Deere 110, L39 & L48 except a foot of reach.

The L48 Loader must be a different story as the linkage on the L48 ought to have more gaf when the bigger deeper bucket digs in than the L39. The L39 bucket ought to be 5'-6" not 72"

On industrial TLB's I've seen how Cats, Deeres , Big NH Fords put a similar size Case to shame in these tough New England soils. It's all weight, mechanical advantage, and hydraulics.

I've always liked the JCB 2C series, too bad they cost near a full size hoe.

I bought the L39 as a Swiss Army knife. I want the Snap-On Roller Tool Chest. I was at the dealer today buying some of the parts I busted and one of the guys was rolling around a KX-161 excavator. What a nice smooth 12,000 lb machine.
 
Your correct, I have no L48 experience, and my only experience with hydro was on a 37 hp Deere, 3700 something. The l48 must push into a pile nice in low range.

Compared to an L39, a 8000 lb machine will have more push than a 7000 lb machine. Specs and the people I have spoken to who ran both machines say there is not a lot of BH difference between the Deere 110, L39 & L48 except a foot of reach.

The L48 Loader must be a different story as the linkage on the L48 ought to have more gaf when the bigger deeper bucket digs in than the L39. The L39 bucket ought to be 5'-6" not 72"

On industrial TLB's I've seen how Cats, Deeres , Big NH Fords put a similar size Case to shame in these tough New England soils. It's all weight, mechanical advantage, and hydraulics.

I've always liked the JCB 2C series, too bad they cost near a full size hoe.

I bought the L39 as a Swiss Army knife. I want the Snap-On Roller Tool Chest. I was at the dealer today buying some of the parts I busted and one of the guys was rolling around a KX-161 excavator. What a nice smooth 12,000 lb machine.
 
Mike,

Sounds like you bought the wrong machine. It's too small for your needs. Kubota brought this to market as a smaller alternative to the L48, which it is.
 
Mike,

Sounds like you bought the wrong machine. It's too small for your needs. Kubota brought this to market as a smaller alternative to the L48, which it is.
 
Oh well, I have given up with the heavy earthmoving, and as my time is limited that I could be doing it myself and a reliable dozer and excavator are real expensive, the wife has beat it in my thick head to hire out.

I still check http://www.ironplanet.com/ and other such sites for the stupid deal. A few months ago an almost new 2005 IR 570 went for $26K in Denver Co. Seems like slim pickens this summer.

In any case my L39 Swiss Army knife makes a great landscaping & maintenance machine overall. When the place shapes up I would not want or need a larger machine.
Besides it's a fun challenge to tackle some of the stuff I have done.
You should see the driveway and wall I did with my little poor old B7200! It was the landscaping that really helped sell that property so we could get more land on the new place.
 

Attachments

  • 902652-B7200&Rocks.pdf
    89.9 KB · Views: 201
Oh well, I have given up with the heavy earthmoving, and as my time is limited that I could be doing it myself and a reliable dozer and excavator are real expensive, the wife has beat it in my thick head to hire out.

I still check http://www.ironplanet.com/ and other such sites for the stupid deal. A few months ago an almost new 2005 IR 570 went for $26K in Denver Co. Seems like slim pickens this summer.

In any case my L39 Swiss Army knife makes a great landscaping & maintenance machine overall. When the place shapes up I would not want or need a larger machine.
Besides it's a fun challenge to tackle some of the stuff I have done.
You should see the driveway and wall I did with my little poor old B7200! It was the landscaping that really helped sell that property so we could get more land on the new place.
 
I gave up on my larger machine (Ford 555 4x4 extendahoe) when I got out of the speculative home building business and went into custom building because my "mass production" ended.
What I have found is that it's cheaper to rent a trackhoe for a few days and use the L-39 to either dig footings or smaller addition foundations and do the backfilling.

I can see where brutal soil conditions would make an L-39's lighter wieght an issue, but I'm in much better digging conditions down here and I'm lovin this machine for small foundations.
 
I gave up on my larger machine (Ford 555 4x4 extendahoe) when I got out of the speculative home building business and went into custom building because my "mass production" ended.
What I have found is that it's cheaper to rent a trackhoe for a few days and use the L-39 to either dig footings or smaller addition foundations and do the backfilling.

I can see where brutal soil conditions would make an L-39's lighter wieght an issue, but I'm in much better digging conditions down here and I'm lovin this machine for small foundations.
 
Exactly.....they're great for all the finish work and medium-large landscaping jobs....perfect to dig trenches and dial in the property, but they certainly aren't "yellow" in any way shape or form. I can rent big stuff not too far down the road without insurance (excavators/dozers etc.) so that's what I do. No more killing myself and the machine doing work it wasn't designed for.
 
Exactly.....they're great for all the finish work and medium-large landscaping jobs....perfect to dig trenches and dial in the property, but they certainly aren't "yellow" in any way shape or form. I can rent big stuff not too far down the road without insurance (excavators/dozers etc.) so that's what I do. No more killing myself and the machine doing work it wasn't designed for.
 

Marketplace Items

Kubota L5030 (A64126)
Kubota L5030 (A64126)
John Deere S350 (A60462)
John Deere S350...
2018 CATERPILLAR 320GC EXCAVATOR (A60429)
2018 CATERPILLAR...
2015 Freightliner M2 106 Terex Hi-Ranger TL55 55ft. Insulated Material Handling Bucket Truck (A60460)
2015 Freightliner...
1995 Jeep Wrangle 4x4 Soft Top (A62613)
1995 Jeep Wrangle...
New/Unused CFG Industrial MX12RX Mini Excavator (A65579)
New/Unused CFG...
 
Top