Can you explain what you do where this is a requirement? I'm genuinely curious, not saying it isn't.
I have not said that engaging/disengaging FWA on the move is a "requirement" but being unable to do this is a serious inconvenience.
I will use my L6060 mostly for mowing. Some of my parcels are very steep, all are irregularly shaped and some have many obstacles.
Being an engineer and lifetime mechanic, as well as one who is particular about my ground cover, I do not engage FWA unless needed. FWA is often needed for braking on some of my steep parcels. It is also sometimes needed to help prevent the tractor from sliding sideways on steep slopes (don't worry, I'm an expert) or otherwise to assist with steering. As a result, I routinely engage/disengage FWA while mowing. I do this currently with my MF 2635 and my 1994 Kubota B1750HST/MMM, used to cut my lawn. Of course, the B1750 does use a dog clutch but I have sufficient common sense so as to not engage FWA when turning tightly, etc. Of course, the FWA system on the L6060 may be similar to that on the B1750HST, allowing knowledgeable engagement/disengagement on the move.If this is so, I will have no serious issue. I have not yet even started my 6060.
By way of comparison, I once owned a 2008 NH T4050 Deluxe. Like the L6060, the Deluxe version of the T4050 was the top of the line model with all of the bells and whistles. It had electric over hydraulic FWA as well as both front and rear electric over hydraulic differential lock. Any/all could be engaged/disengaged regardless of conditions. Indeed, all could be put under the control of the computer such that any/all were automitically engaged/disengaged.
Before buying the L6060, I was well aware that it did not have computer controlled electric over hydraulic FWA (let alone differential lock (either F or R)) but it did not occur to me that the FWA might require a full stop to engage/disengage. Such requirement negates at least some of the advantagegs of a hydrostatic transmission for my purposes.
SDT