GuglioLS said:
I still appreciate your metal bending tip, but your prediction of dire consequences for my rake have not materialized,

better luck next time.
Larry,
It wasnt a prediction, just a warning.

No such thing as "bad luck" for me that it didnt fall apart, i just warned you to help you... It shouldnt be necessary to say that i was NOT hoping it would fail, off course not !
After watching your video, i think i've highly over estimated the forces on a landscape rake. (I've never seen a real one in our flat, rock free country, i just know them from TBN

)
.... But do you really stand behind your statement of ramming it on either edge into a battleship, with the rake angled near its dead point ???
According to your video, for a landscape rake this construction will be fine. But if i use that construction on my scraper blade (still in preparation phase, moldboard has been made, havent found some frame beams yet to continue) to cut a deep ditch in offset mode with only the edge of the blade hitting the ground, in a sharp angle to bring up soil out of a deep ditch, with our 5245 (with loader roughly 3800 kg, MFWD) i would place my first-fail bet on the hydraulic cylinder...
I have a bale clamp for square, plastic wrapped bales on my front loader. It has a calculated clamping force of about 8 to 900 kg.
When i tried to push some bales into a bale stack that was dangerously leaning, i had the clamp opened so i pushed into the hydraulics. Result was that the front cap of the cylinder, busted out of the liner and i got an oily mess on those bales... From now on i put the 3rd function on my loader in float, so it pushes on the hinge, not on the hydraulic cylinder.
Its not the hydraulic forces that may, (MAY !!) cause damage, but the result of forces working on a very long arm, multiplied on a very short arm that bust cylinders.
So far my criticism, about what MAY happen in case of severe abuse
To correct any misinterpretations of my criticism,

I'll just say it like the rest of the guys here: NICE RAKE !!
