Tires Loaded tires

   / Loaded tires
  • Thread Starter
#11  
That might make sense. Another thought: I see the point with a front loader needing the weight...especially going downhill. However, suppose you do not have your FEL on and an implement on the rear going uphill? Now you need front weight or a reduction in the tire weight? Removable weight would seem to be better.
 
   / Loaded tires #12  
Bill,Thanks for doing the math.800 pounds would be just right,same as my ballast.........Mike
 
   / Loaded tires #13  
<font color=red>"the constant weight on the frame would cause axle bearings and other suspension parts to wear faster than they would if the weight was not on the axles (i.e., in the wheel or tire)."</font color=red>

Mark,they have some good points.I've heard that too much front weight on 2wd tractors will often bend and break front axles because the wheels cannot climb out of trouble easily.
I don't know if this would apply to rear wheels but I did have a tractor with weighted rears and it had a tendency to throw the tractor(and me) around on uneven ground.
I guess they all have pros/cons...........Mike
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

2015 Ford F-450 Knapheide Service Truck (A51692)
2015 Ford F-450...
1996 Timpte 46ft Hopper (A53473)
1996 Timpte 46ft...
1995 Vermeer 935 Towable Brush Chipper (A51691)
1995 Vermeer 935...
2015 ISUZU NPR 16FT BOX TRUCK (A54313)
2015 ISUZU NPR...
2001 HAULMARK ELITE II 8' X 24' CARGO TRAILER (A51247)
2001 HAULMARK...
JOHN DEERE ROW MARKERS - SET OF STACK FOLD 12 ROW 30 INCH ROW MARKERS (A53473)
JOHN DEERE ROW...
 
Top