Loader Lift Capacity vs Curl Capacity

[k0ua]

It's not the cylinder, it's the piston. The piston has more surface area on the extend side than it does on the retract side because the piston rod takes up surface area on the piston face on the rod side of the piston.

You are correct sir.

 

[oosik]

I can lift & curl some pretty heavy loads with the M6040. 3000# is about the max limit. This is because I have a grapple on the FEL which places the load closer to the bucket pivot pins and I never lift a really heavy load more than 12". Really heavy loads will leave "knuckle drag marks" as I move the load around.

The higher I lift - the lighter the load.

I use timber weight charts to estimate log weights.

I have large rock weight charts also. They are more like an estimate. If a rock is too large/heavy - chain it up and drag it.

 

[mcfarmall]

If you notice on many wheel loaders and TLB's (at least the big ones) the curl cylinder(s) are leveraged in such a way that the curl function is performed when the cylinder extends and the dump function is performed when the cylinder retracts. This provides three distinct advantages:

#1 the cylinder delivers more force extending than retracting therefore provides more force to curl the bucket. (strength)
#2 the cylinder delivers more speed retracting than extending due to a smaller piston area therefore dumping the bucket faster. (efficiency)
#3 the opportunity to bend a cylinder rod when backdragging is all but eliminated because the cylinder is retracted when the bucket lip is pointed to the ground. (durability)

 

[dodge man]

I think people might have missed something in the OP’s post, he was lifting pallets with forks. I have found the same thing with my tractor, it is because a lot of the weight is so much further forward on the forks than if curling something in the bucket.

 

[MossRoad]

I think people might have missed something in the OP’s post, he was lifting pallets with forks. I have found the same thing with my tractor, it is because a lot of the weight is so much further forward on the forks than if curling something in the bucket.

Good point.

 

[Hilbilly]

I think some of you missed the issue, which was does your tractor lift more or curl more (lets say at ground level). As I recall, my Massey's both curled more than they would lift but this tractor is the reverse.

I am aware of hydraulic cylinders have more power and speed in one direction over the other but that is not relevant to this question, since there are 2 different cylinders being referred to and both are being used in one direction.

As dodge man pointed out, I was using pallet forks for this operation but I have the same experience when digging into piles of material using the bucket. The curl function is weaker than the lift function. I see some of you have the same experience with your tractors and some are the reverse. What I really find odd is that 4570man says his Kubota will curl more than it will lift and my Kubota is the reverse.

Any one have a link to source that gives a definition of "breakout force"? I have looked and can't find a definitive description or how it is calculated. I chased this once before and I thought I found a source that indicated "breakout force" was the maximum weight (at the bucket edge) that could be curled at ground level.

 

[Hilbilly]

I found it and it clearly shows that the "breakout force" is the curl function. According to the Kubota spec sheet for my loader I should be able to curl 75% (3171 lbs / 1784 lbs) more weight than I can lift, which is not the case.

 

[MechE1]

Great topic. Keep in mind a couple things. 1. Linkages change applied loading (force/angle). 2. With the cylinder link system it will not be a linear function. As your cylinder rod end changes angle to the linked arm, the applied force to the end of the linked arm changes but the force created by the cylinder would not change. Ideal is like a fork truck. Straight lift. Loader arms for CUTs are no where near that. As for curl vs lift. Curl should be more. However, add 42 inches of fork (whatever center of load distance is) and the curl force required will change quickly. A 1000lb load at 21in from hinge point with a 9in distance for cylinder mount will need 2300lbs to lift (curl) force. If the cylinder angle is not 90deg to that link (and/or link to fork) then the force required increase (which is likely the case). As those angles change, the lift force changes (because the pressure does not change). Fun project is to take those link measurements and cylinder angles on your tractor and graph them in excel using the cylinder pressure. You'll see those cylinder forces (capacities) throughout the range of motion.

 

[Hilbilly]

Here are 2 pages out of the Kubota Operator's Manual for my loader.


The graphs on page 5 show the lift and rollback capacities at different heights. I assume the rollback graph is at the pins. If that is correct, then the rollback capacity at ground level is less than the lift capacity. However this reverses quickly and at 500 mm above the ground the rollback capacity is more than the lift capacity. From what I can determine, the loader specs listed in the tractor brochure show the lift capacity at maximum height (not at ground level, where the capacity is much higher). However the breakout (rollback force) listed in the brochure is for the capacity 500 mm forward of the pins and it does not appear to show that information on the graph, in the Operator's Manual. Looking at the drop in capacity from the pin location, to the 500 mm location for the lift capacities and assuming the drop would be about the same for the rollback capacity, then it appears the brochure is listing the rollback (breakout force) at ground level.

The brochure appears to show lift and rollback capacities at different locations, which just adds to the confusion.

 

[MechE1]

Well.....what you are looking at according to the image is the force with the bucket bottom level? Maybe that is the definition of rollback force. What's really going on is your cylinder for your bucket is changing angle to the bucket if keeping the bucket bottom level as the arms raise, thus the force changes. Let's change the terminology for a second. Change it from force to moment about the pin (torque if you prefer to think of it that way). It does not matter the height of your loader arms. That does not have any effect on the moment about the pin. If your bucket remained in the same rotation relative to the arm (curl cylinder was same extension), then the available moment about the pin would be exactly the same. Look at the images on the right. The curl cylinder when loader in up position vs. down position. you can see it swings thru the "perpendicular to" angle. This angle is your maximum force applied at the cylinder connection (but may be different angle than max breakout force depending on some geometry). As stated in earlier post, this is not linear. So cylinder/linkage designers design for an "ideal condition" location and then realize that force will be reduced as the cylinder swings thru the arc.