Loader question

   / Loader question #41  
in DK35vinces photo it shows how the arms do not fully retract. Why do they all seem to be like this ? If the upper holes were higher the arms would fully retract, the curl back angle better , and a greater mechanical advantage for curl back power etc. Is Kioti monitoring any if this ????????? DO any dealers that are monitoring this forum, I know you are out there, have anything to add.???
 
   / Loader question
  • Thread Starter
#42  
Here is another photo of the quick attach from a differant angle.
I don't have a digital camera to get pictures of my loader and bucket,These photos are from my dealers website.
 

Attachments

  • 341757-Bobcat%20universal%20hitch%202.jpg
    341757-Bobcat%20universal%20hitch%202.jpg
    25.5 KB · Views: 221
   / Loader question #43  
those curling arms where the piston connects, if they were raised or lengthened a few inches, you would gain tremendous roll and dump angles..
 
   / Loader question #44  
It looks like the holes are the same distance apart for the bucket. So maybe as in the bucket an extra set of holes is required. It sure seems it would work and not that risky I don't believe it would weaken the quick attach. But it is not something that is clear in the picture as even an option
 
   / Loader question #45  
Has your roll back issue been a problem from the start.? And are there 2 hole sets on the quick attach.?
 
   / Loader question
  • Thread Starter
#46  
</font><font color="blue" class="small">( those curling arms where the piston connects, if they were raised or lengthened a few inches, you would gain tremendous roll and dump angles.. )</font>

The way I had it figured is the higher the curling arms are raised the more leverage (power) will increase, but my roll back or dump angles will decrease.
I'll need to do some measuring to know for sure and see what a happy medium would be.
 
   / Loader question
  • Thread Starter
#47  
</font><font color="blue" class="small">( It looks like the holes are the same distance apart for the bucket. So maybe as in the bucket an extra set of holes is required. It sure seems it would work and not that risky I don't believe it would weaken the quick attach. But it is not something that is clear in the picture as even an option
)</font>

The quick attach is strong enough to add an extra set of holes with no problem.
The only thing I need to work around is the Quick attach cross braces.
 
   / Loader question #48  
remember the old lengthen the shackle arms to raise the back of cars? Make some temp shackle arms, use long bolts and see where the best leverage spot will be. Other than four strips of steel and a couple of bolts. you may be able to figure a good spot to reset the piston arms
 
   / Loader question
  • Thread Starter
#49  
My quick attach is slightly differant from the one in the photo.
Instead of bars for cross braces, mine uses a solid plate all the way across the front and half way down the back of the quick attach.
 
   / Loader question
  • Thread Starter
#50  
</font><font color="blue" class="small">( Make some temp shackle arms, use long bolts and see where the best leverage spot will be. Other than four strips of steel and a couple of bolts. you may be able to figure a good spot to reset the piston arms )</font>

No Problem ! /forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif
I will get to work on that the first chance I get.
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

AMG M 35A2C drop side 2 1/2 ton 6 x 6 (A50323)
AMG M 35A2C drop...
72In FEL HD Round Back Bucket (A52128)
72In FEL HD Round...
Craftsman LT2000 42in. Riding Mower (A49346)
Craftsman LT2000...
Takeuchi TL140 (A47384)
Takeuchi TL140...
2008 STEPHENS 220BBL CRUDE OIL TRAILER (A50854)
2008 STEPHENS...
2019 CATERPILLAR 236D3 WHEELED SKID STEER (A51242)
2019 CATERPILLAR...
 
Top