The cycle time was a factor for me. 11 seconds was one of the shortest times I've seen. It makes a difference.
Once you get above about 22 tons, this is all that matters, IMO. I see guys buying these 27 ton and 35 ton splitters with wimpy little 11 or 16 GPM pumps, and feel bad for them, most just don't understand what it takes to make a suitable splitter.
I've owned many over the years, and at least for what I do, 22 tons is the sweet spot. That's enough force to never stall in anything I'd actually ever want to split, without giving up so much speed as to make the thing unusable. John_Mc already did a good job of laying out the basic math, no need to repeat here, 22 tons = 4" bore at the 3500 psi most of these systems run.
Because force and volume go up at the same rate, each incremental increase in splitting force comes with the same incremental decrease in travel speed, given the same pump. So, adding extra force beyond your minimum need, is just taking a voluntary speed reduction, with no good reason for it.
If I were to start over, buying a new splitter today, it would the lighest platform that has the largest available pump. In homeowner grade splitters, that usually means a 23 GPM pump on a 12-16 HP engine, with a big honkin 6" (35 ton) cylinder. Then I'd remove that stupid unnecessarily large cylinder, sell it on ebay, and replace it with a 4" cylinder of the same length and configuration. That'd get you down around 5-6 seconds round-trip time on a 24" stroke, if everything else is sized suitably... just about fast enough for me.
I would never want a log lift, but to each their own. Much easier to go vertical, when you're dragging home a lot of 500#-plus rounds, and the lift just gets in the way and slows down operations when working smaller stuff. I'm doing 10 - 14 cords per year, with precious few hours per month to get it all done, so speed is the only thing that matters here and now. But I reserve the right to change my opinion when I retire, or the kids move out.
