To20Chris
Platinum Member
The long stroke comment got me to thinking - old British engines were always small bore, long stroke. Why? Because the tax code only looked at bore! Long stroke is a mixed bag. For a given displacement it has more torque when the crank is a 90deg, but the short stroke/big bore engine has more torque when the piston is near TDC, because the piston is a pneumatic piston with more surface area. Long stroke engines have greater piston speed and more wear, made worse by the greater angle of the conrod pushing into the cylinder wall, unless you use a really long conrod, and then you get a really tall block. If you run a long stroke engine at high RPM, the reciprocating forces can get quite large, which equals more stress.
In the old days metalurgy, stress analysis, machining tolerances, lubricants, and fuels were not always as good, so low RPM was all that was practical. Given that, long stroke was no penalty and probably gives better torque throughout the crankshaft rotation. These days, something around "square" (bore=stroke) seems to work best, and that is how my Kioti, and I think most others, is designed.
In the old days metalurgy, stress analysis, machining tolerances, lubricants, and fuels were not always as good, so low RPM was all that was practical. Given that, long stroke was no penalty and probably gives better torque throughout the crankshaft rotation. These days, something around "square" (bore=stroke) seems to work best, and that is how my Kioti, and I think most others, is designed.