With all the discussion, I am seeing that my personal definition of lugging was completely off base. By using the throttle to determine the load, I guess I have very seldom actually been lugging the engine... just pulling the RPM down quite a bit when doing work or moving. It would still speed up again with the same load if I gave it more throttle. That helps tremendously.
I do want some additional clarification on lugging when it is looked at from the opposite end of the spectrum though. If using the throttle definition of lugging, then hydrostatic tractors uniquely have the ability to approach the lugging issue from the other side. Example... a geared tractor will very seldom have a gear that perfectly equalizes a load with the maximum output of the engine. Gear 4 might be too low and engine lugs (using the throttle definition), but gear 3 not lugging and engine is able to speed up if more throttle is applied. In contrast to that, an HST tractor could be at full operating engine speed and mowing with a RFM. The HST peddle could be depressed and you are mowing along at a given speed. If your forward speed was any faster then engine cant handle it and loses RPM. HST has effectively given you the ability to equalize the forward speed and balance right on the threshold of being overloaded (and not able to speed up if you give it more throttle), but on the same token it is not losing ground either.
How would you guys classify this type of usage? This is typically how I mow when I use my RFM. Go as absolutely fast as I can without bogging down the engine.... but it sure wouldn't speed up in RPM if I gave it any more throttle.
Getut