vtsnowedin
Elite Member
No your example is wrong. A single layer of splits will only be half as thick as the layer of rounds is. You have to consider all three dimensions.To get the most wood for your money when buying firewood, buy it 'in the round'. A measured cord of rounds will produce a full cord of splits and some left over (about 10%)
For those who doubt that here is a simple experiment. Take a tapered carrot and a box lid. Slice the carrot up into "rounds" and pack as many as you can single lay in the box lid. Dump out, split in halfs and try to put them all back in (single layer). You'll have some left over. To carry it further, dump out the "half splits" and split them. Put the 'quarter splts' back in the lid. Again you'll hve some left over.
For those who think they can load in rounds and then add splits in hte "holes" - eyeball your next load - you'll find that, unless the rounds are HUGE, there will only be a hole or two big enough to tak anything more than a piece of kindling.
Harry K
Saw logs are still scaled individually as they go by the board foot. It is pulp wood for paper mills that is sold by the cord or used to be . they are going to grind it up anyway. Anybody can measure a cord in the woods where scales are only at the mills and are now much more common then they once were.. An old law on a cord read" A stack of wood with the limbs clipped close neatly ranked and stacked four feet wide by four feet high and eight feet long shall be a cord." No leaving nots sticking out two inches creating an air space between the sticks. When I was a kid some mills only wanted poplar or spurce with the bark peeled off it. A lot of work doing that and a short season in the spring when you can do it.