</font><font color="blue" class="small">( OH PLEASE STOP. It is well known that you have an exceptional relationship with your dealer, you've even written where you helped unload some new tractors when they were delivered. But let's set the record straight (and Highbeam if I missed something please correct me).)</font>
So what if it's well known, Bob? Does that change the fact that he would have taken care of a customer. It wouldn't have to me!
</font><font color="blue" class="small">( Joe went to his dealer with a cracked loader. The dealer went to Kioti. Koiti authorized a repair at a 3rd party shop. The shop did a crummy job. Joe's dealer agreed it was a crummy job. But the dealer really is not to blame here. He may not be the best dealer, but he sure sounds to be trying to be responsive. He is attempting to take care of the problem but the reality is the problem is bigger than just a repair.)</font>
Read Joe's posts. He has said many times that much of it was the dealer's fault. The dealer chose the welder, not Kioti, OH PLEASE STOP. After all Bob, there's no reason Joe's tractor should even be at the dealers. The tractor is NOT NEEDED TO MAKE THE REPAIR TO THE LOADER. Joe could be cutting his oh so tall grass right now, AND EVERYONE KNOWS IT.
</font><font color="blue" class="small">( And if the dealer lends a tractor to Joe, then the dealer is going to take a new tractor, and reduce it to 'loaner' status, which means it will sell for less, and therefore that is money out of the dealer's pocket. Most dealers will not lend out tractors. It sounds like Joe's dealer is a small dealer so he probably can't lend out a tractor. It seems to me that you are just trying to deflect the problem and blame Joe's dealer.)</font>
I'm not trying to deflect anything at all. I've already posted that Kioti should notify owners of the loaders that there could be a problem with them. What more do you want from me? How much more can you twist my words to your own liking, like telling us that Neil said he was doing a spread sheet for his company, which HE DID NOT SAY.
</font><font color="blue" class="small">( Kioti could have fixed this long ago, they seem reluctant to do that.)</font> We've hashed and rehashed that misnomer.
Kioti has been trying to do just that. It's only been a few weeks since Joe actually sent the pictures for them to see!
</font><font color="blue" class="small">( All that is being asked for by folks like Highbeam, IslandTractor, and the others is for Kioti to admit there is a problem,
for Kioti to send out a letter or notice saying they are working on a solution, and then to ultimately fix the problem correctly.)</font>
Gosh Mr. Bob, I don't know what I would do without you to tell me what I've already read over and over. You have taken this opportunity to simply restate all the negatives of this thread, and to misrepresent all of my statements, based on me saying Joe should have a loaner. It's not much different that a dealer who drops off a tractor for a few days for someone to try out on their properties. This is something you advocate frequently, so what's changed? Why are you now saying it's such a negative thing? Because it's convenient to your argument which is all wet!
</font><font color="blue" class="small">( Nobody asked for an immediate fix. This has become a PUBLIC RELATIONS problem that is far bigger than a loader problem.)</font>
This is so blatantly untrue so as to be funny. You yourself just said </font><font color="blue" class="small">( Kioti could have fixed this long ago, they seem reluctant to do that.)</font>
Island tractor has said several times that he's made because the problem hasn't been taken care of. One only has to reread the posts to know that your statment is incorrect.
As for the public realtions problem, I doubt seriously that it would be nearly the problem it has become had non Kioti owners not come here to stir up all this ruckus.
You may say as many times as you want that you are objective, but the misstatements in this post alone are enough to show anyone that you are not.
This thread has become as non-productive as any I have ever seen. Isn't it amazing that a certain moderator, who has ended lesser controversies much sooner has chosen to allow this crap to continue.
John