Need help with Kubota model #s

   / Need help with Kubota model #s #1  

Keith_B

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2004
Messages
784
Location
Kentucky
Tractor
Mahindra 4110
I am planning on purchasing a CUT this spring, and am beginning the looking and learning process in preparation for the decision. Kubota has so many model numbers and extensions of those model numbers I am not sure what to look for. On their website they mention an L4300 (is this the same as an L4330?)and a Grand L4330, what the heck is the difference?

What I am basically looking for is a tractor with a 40hp engine, gear driven tranny to keep the costs down. I need the tractor to be able to handle 4X5 round bales to feed my horses in the pasture, the loader will be used to lift the bales and dump them into the feeder. I want the tractor to be able to handle some existing farm equipment, primarily a 6' disk and a 6' bush hog, and I plan on getting a post hole digger to help with putting up new fence. I want the tractor to be equipped with dual rear hydraulic remotes, because ya never know when you might need them.

My target price for my new investment is $20,000 or less. Is this doable with a Kubota?
 
   / Need help with Kubota model #s #2  
Keith
Here is a very recent thread on L4300. Click Here.
The L4300 model is an economy model.
L4330 has all the bells and whistles to make tractor use easier. Electronic dash and telescoping lower links to mentions a couple.
 
   / Need help with Kubota model #s
  • Thread Starter
#3  
Looking at the specs it appears that the 4300 has slightly more HP developed by the same engine than the 4330, gross HP 45.3 to 43.2; and the PTO HP is 37.5 to 36. On the downside for the 4300 it appears they use a bit less powerful hydraulic pump than the 4330, 14.1 to 10.7; that is a significant difference; which results in the 4330 having greater lift capacity.

I am sure that this also impacts loader usage and lift capacities. Any comments on the 4330's loader usage? How about the 4330 in the 8X8 or 12X12 configurations?

Is the shuttle shift on the 4330 a clutchless hydraulic shift, shift on the fly clutch shift, or one where you have to come to a complete stop using the clutch?
 
   / Need help with Kubota model #s #4  
</font><font color="blue" class="small">( On the downside for the 4300 it appears they use a bit less powerful hydraulic pump than the 4330, 14.1 to 10.7; that is a significant difference; which results in the 4330 having greater lift capacity. )</font>

Quite true but take a close look at those numbers. The Kubotas have 2 pumps, one for implements and one for power steering. On the L4330 the PS pump is 4.7 gpm and the implement pump is 9.4 gpm for 14.1 total. I don't have the numbers for the 4300 handy but I'll bet the ratio is about the same.

BTW, the MSRP for the L4330DT 8x8 shuttle is going to be just over $20,000 without a loader.
 
   / Need help with Kubota model #s #6  
Keith B, Just trying to help with number interpretations. An increase of hydraulic flow (GPM) will not increase the tractor's lift capacity. Lift is a function of lbs/sq.in. on the actuators. Its more of a total design issue. Usually lift capability is a function of the tractor's weight, axle strength, etc. in a variety of uses. Higher flow may increase cycle speed. I think you will be quite satisfied with Kubota's cycle times.

I recommend trying to determine weight of your task. You may need the weight. I think HP will be further down the list.

I see you have some hills. How much work will you be doing on slopes? Personally, I would consider trading the hyd. remotes for something I might use every day. If it turns out you need them later, they can be added. For example, the hydro appears to be less than the remotes. You would use that every time on the tractor. You may never use your remotes....

Having been through all this, it tough with all the options.
 
   / Need help with Kubota model #s #7  
"I would consider trading the hyd. remotes for something I might use every day. If it turns out you need them later, they can be added. For example, the hydro appears to be less than the remotes. You would use that every time on the tractor. You may never use your remotes...."

White rock has the best advice period.......

1. You will never regret it!!
2. You will wonder how you ever got along w/o it.
3. If you want to sell it someday it won't be the biggest reason someone else doesn't want it!!
 
   / Need help with Kubota model #s #8  
I am the owner of a 2002 L 4330 and I can say it is great to run. There's plenty of power to spare with the loader and lift too. I am sure other models are nice as well but I have frist hand experence with this one and no complaints. And it is a HST, this machine gets all farm related uses and never disapoints. I think I want one of those grubber buckets that Mark Hamm welding sells. Luck to you all just my two cents.teddy
 
   / Need help with Kubota model #s
  • Thread Starter
#9  
I don't really want a hydrostatic tranny, unless it is the case of a used machine with too good a price to turn down. I like geared transmissions, I am prefectly comfortable with a geared tractor, and

In regards to the remotes, there are a lot of ways to use those remotes to make life much easier. Things like a hydraulic top links, hydraulic rams put on a grader blade to enable angling from the seat, etc. A hydraulic cylinder can be a powerful tool.
 
   / Need help with Kubota model #s #10  
Keith, I'm gonna argue in favor of the L4300 (or its apparent successor, the L4400) because I just got one. Like you, I'm totally comfortable with gears and consider things like dual remotes valuable for what may come. If I've got 'em, I'll be more likely to find a use for them. If I have to buy them after the fact and install them, that's just another barrier to exploring a new use for them.

Though sharing the same engine, the L4300 is not quite the machine the L4330 is. As you noted, hydraulic pump capacity is less (6.4gpm vs. 9.4gpm). One consequence is that the L4300 will not handle the L4330's LA853 FEL. Instead the L4300 uses the LA682 FEL which nearly duplicates the LA723 loader used on the L3830 and smaller Grand L machines. I was concerned about that when ordering but went ahead anyway. The difference between the loaders, to quote just one spec., is a lift capacity at bucket center of about 1500# for the LA682/723 as compared to about 1870# for the larger LA853. I doubted the significance of this at the time and still do. Unless rear ballasted at the 3pt. to the tune of close to 1000#, I suspect a 1500# bucket load would stand the tractor on its nose.

Maybe more significant for your application is the availability from Kubota of standard skid steer quick attach fittings on the Grand L series FELs. The LA682 has, as an option, a proprietary Kubota quick attach for which only a limited number of loader attachments are available. Aftermarket skid steer quick attach addapters are available for the LA682, but they are heavy and expensive. I ultimately went without any type of quick attach as it made the Brush Claw I bought with the tractor a much simpler installation.

The bells & whistles of the Grand L series can make ownership and operation more pleasant, no doubt, but what I wanted was a workhorse. With the L4300, I think I got it. It's not so pretty, expensive or sophisticated that I'll be afraid to work it.

FWIW, I'll quote what I paid off the invoice:
L4300DT w/R1 tires $12930
Block Heater $ 65
Loaded rear tires $ 250
LA682 FEL w/L1790 66" bucket $ 3665
L8408/L8410 Dual Rear Remotes $ 885
------------
Total $17795

I didn't pursue it far, but going L4630 w/HST and LA853 FEL probably would've added $6000 to the above....more than I wanted to tie up.

There was a sales incentive on the L4300 that was in force on the day I ordered it (9/30/04). I was told it would save me around $2000. Because of that, I moved a little quicker than I might've. If it's not still available, you might have trouble duplicating these prices. But that $2000 meant alot to me. With it I was able to buy the Brush Claw for the bucket and a Woods HBL84 rear blade with skid shoes. Kubota was probably trying to clear out the L4300 inventory before bringing on the new L4400.

From what information I have, the new L4400 has a few advantages over the L4300. It's a bit heavier, for one and has a longer wheelbase. More importantly, it has a more convenient transmission arrangement that'll make shuttling with the loader a bit easier. It also has 4 reverse speeds as opposed to 2 for the L4300. It's essentially an updated L4300.

If you can get the incentive prices for the L4300, it's definitely worth looking into. If not, you might want to wait for the L4400. By spring they should be readily available.

I've noticed, on this forum, that the consensus of the regulars is generally to go top-of-the-line. It's nice if you can afford it, but knowing what people successfully farm with around here convinced me it isn't necessary. Besides, among neighbors and family, I didn't want to become known as the one with the Yuppie tractor /forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif.
Bob
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

2013 Cadillac ATS Sedan (A50324)
2013 Cadillac ATS...
Toro Zero Turn Mower (A50324)
Toro Zero Turn...
2015 FREIGHTLINER CASCADIA DAY CAB (A51222)
2015 FREIGHTLINER...
RoGator 844 sprayer (A50490)
RoGator 844...
2016 Ford Escape SUV (A50324)
2016 Ford Escape...
1991 International 4900 Box Truck (A51039)
1991 International...
 
Top