Sportsman762
Veteran Member
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2008
- Messages
- 1,049
JJ
I never meant to suggest that they fail in any order. What I was trying to convey is that they failed in a repetitively short time of one another (a season or two). I gave that as an example of what I had seen happen. They would fail in any order, normally with they hydro's failing first.
You are correct in saying that just because the motor failed that there is no proof that a hydro will fail. It is just that I have seen that when one (hydro or engine) then the others are not far behind. However it is difficult to tell when a hydro will fail as they have a tendency to fail catastrophically. My post is not as cut and dry as 2+2=4, but that my experience has shown with hydrostatic zero-turns with air cooled gas engines the engines and hydros have about the same life.
I hope this has shed more light on my original post.
I never meant to suggest that they fail in any order. What I was trying to convey is that they failed in a repetitively short time of one another (a season or two). I gave that as an example of what I had seen happen. They would fail in any order, normally with they hydro's failing first.
You are correct in saying that just because the motor failed that there is no proof that a hydro will fail. It is just that I have seen that when one (hydro or engine) then the others are not far behind. However it is difficult to tell when a hydro will fail as they have a tendency to fail catastrophically. My post is not as cut and dry as 2+2=4, but that my experience has shown with hydrostatic zero-turns with air cooled gas engines the engines and hydros have about the same life.
I hope this has shed more light on my original post.