Interesting, the asymmetry looks a bit odd to the eye, but it makes sense when explained by the manufacturer.
I have seen tire technology come a long way through the years (I'm 67), the bias ply tires I drove on offered little traction compared to modern radials, and talk about tread life....we used to get 10,000- 15,000 per set (when not hot rodding), now 50,000- 60,000 is common. Every Fall meant switching to snow tires and Spring meant back to conventional tires. Modern all season tires put an end to that ritual.
Also known as an asymmetric tire.
Interesting, the asymmetry looks a bit odd to the eye, but it makes sense when explained by the manufacturer.
I have seen tire technology come a long way through the years (I'm 67), the bias ply tires I drove on offered little traction compared to modern radials, and talk about tread life....we used to get 10,000- 15,000 per set (when not hot rodding), now 50,000- 60,000 is common. Every Fall meant switching to snow tires and Spring meant back to conventional tires. Modern all season tires put an end to that ritual.
...maybe in Missouri!
I agree that tires are a lot better now days....but...
Last week, I took off 16 "all seasons" and put on 16 snow tires (32 total) on wife's, son's, daughter's and my cars. Whew! 8 of the 16 snow's have studs. IMHO, there's no comparison of studded to non-studded, no comparison of snows to all seasons.
When my local Sears debuted the Allstate Radial (Michelin origin) they had a set in the store with a notation that the previous owner had put 60k miles on the tire......and there was more than 2/32 rubber left. Was impressive for the reason you mentioned....but the price at the time required a hard swallow....or better yet, GULP!