Robert_in_NY
Super Member
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2001
- Messages
- 8,552
- Location
- Silver Creek, NY
- Tractor
- Case-IH Farmall 45A, Kubota M8540 Narrow, New Holland TN 65, Bobcat 331, Ford 1920, 1952 John Deere M, Allis Chalmers B, Bombardier Traxter XT, Massey Harris 81RC and a John Deere 3300 combine, Cub Cadet GT1554
The Cat he was going to use was not the Big Cat it was the smaller model similar to a JD 8000T so around 200hp. I have farmers here that run 575 NH balers on a MX200 without any problem. In the case of the Cat cutting hay, its width is not a problem as with bigger mowers they have bigger tounges and are designed to work with larger machines. The Cat (I think it was a 45 but don't remember) is actually no wider then a typical wheeled tractor and depending on tires the Cat is narrower then some. The field they were cutting hay was going to be chopped for haylage and not baled. All he used the Cat for was to cut the hay down. I don't remember what other equipment they used for the rest of the job and I don't think it really mattered.
As for the hydraulic PTO, the Cat that was being used came with a 3pt and pto. The people who use hydraulic PTO are the guys who buy an old bareback Artic tractor and want to run the grain cart they already have that has a PTO. Most new Grain carts are all hydraulic so it is very few farmers that would even need to use a hydraulic pto. I didn't say it was efficient but it got the job done for the guys who needed it.
As for the hydraulic PTO, the Cat that was being used came with a 3pt and pto. The people who use hydraulic PTO are the guys who buy an old bareback Artic tractor and want to run the grain cart they already have that has a PTO. Most new Grain carts are all hydraulic so it is very few farmers that would even need to use a hydraulic pto. I didn't say it was efficient but it got the job done for the guys who needed it.