smstonypoint
Super Member
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2009
- Messages
- 6,119
- Location
- SC (Upstate) & NC (Piedmont)
- Tractor
- NH TN 55, Kubota B2320 & RTV 900, Bad Boy Outlaw ZTR
I will now conduct the 'Blind' hammer v. nail experiment, using standard Australian work-shed/laboratory hand-held pounding implements! Wish me luck!
Yes Steve, I'll video the experiment!
[2 Scientific hours later...]
Here are the results of the "'Blind' hammer v. nail experiment, using standard Australian work-shed/laboratory hand-held pounding implements". As can be observed, most of the nails (matched in composition to the original nails above), at first, entered fairly straight. Then the experiment went somewhat awry and the misshaped nails began to be produced.
I've included the array of standard Australian work-shed/laboratory hand-held pounding implements that were to be utilised... I say "were" because I only got up to using the smaller BFH before both of my hands were rendered useless.
Which is also the reason that there is no video as, I'm afraid, that my vocal expletives were of such intensity as to cause the whole recording to be censored. My apologies to all in that regard.
1. Are you asking the scientific community to accept your " scientific results" without providing video evidence that the so-called "scientific results" were obtained by a blind test? An expression often used by the laymen on TBN is "Without pictures, it didn't happen." We scientist say "Without video, it didn't happen."
2. Although your "photographic evidence" is suspect, many of the nails resemble the letters of the ancient Sumerian alphabet. In their configuration in the photo, they spell out a vulgar phrase.
3. There is no #3.
4. Again, although your "photographic evidence" is suspect, two out of the ten nails are L-shaped. The relative frequency is then 2/10 (US) or 20% (metric). The null hypothesis is that p1 - p2 = 0, where p1 is the proportion from the first population and p2 the proportion from the second. The alternative is that the two proportions differ. The null hypothesis cannot be rejected using a 5% significance level. Z Test Calculator for 2 Poulation Proportions. What does this mean?
5. Please store the specimens in a #2 mayonnaise jar.
6. I see no photographic evidence of the scientific device that you used to assure blindness during the experiment.
Steve