Pat's Easy Change Vs Quick Hitch

   / Pat's Easy Change Vs Quick Hitch #51  
Short pins are not a problem for PEC, that's a function of your side stabilizers. I'm guessing you don't know what clevis type lift points are

//greg//

The poster may be referring to the fact that very seldom the distance between the pin and the implement in a clevis-style hook-up is very tight. The Pat's CAT 1 will just barely fit front to back (pin to implement).

The addition of a bushing and the extra girth of the CAT 2 Pat's causes the distance between the pin and the implement to be just a hair too small for the CAT 2 hook to slide up the gap.

A solution would be to grind off some of the front of the Pat's hook but that would be a last resort for me.

That is my take on the comment.
 
   / Pat's Easy Change Vs Quick Hitch #52  
The Pat's CAT 1 will just barely fit front to back (pin to implement).
The addition of a bushing and the extra girth of the CAT 2 Pat's causes the distance between the pin and the implement to be just a hair too small for the CAT 2 hook to slide up the gap.
A solution would be to grind off some of the front of the Pat's hook but that would be a last resort for me
I thought that's what I said. Except for the bit about grinding the excess off the PEC. I thought that part should have gone without saying. Equipment with lifting capacities rated in tons - is best left well enough alone.

//greg//
 
   / Pat's Easy Change Vs Quick Hitch
  • Thread Starter
#53  
greg_g said:
Short pins are not the issue to which I was referring. For the most part, that's a function of your side stabilizers. I'm guessing you don't know what clevis type lift points are

//greg//

I think the issue was more I was reading one thing and thinking about something else, a particular implement. I have two implements with the clevis style attachments.
 
   / Pat's Easy Change Vs Quick Hitch #54  
I think the issue was more I was reading one thing and thinking about something else, a particular implement. I have two implements with the clevis style attachments.
Ok, no problem. I wish that I still had my PECs, I'd measure the thickness of both. That way you could gauge if either/both will fit. The tight spot will be fitting between the pin and the implement during the up and down motion of the lift arms. I experienced binding with the Cat2 PEC.

But Greenwells are very very good on the customer relations front. Just givem a call and they'll give you that measurement.

//greg//
 
   / Pat's Easy Change Vs Quick Hitch
  • Thread Starter
#55  
greg_g said:
Ok, no problem. I wish that I still had my PECs, I'd measure the thickness of both. That way you could gauge if either/both will fit. The tight spot will be fitting between the pin and the implement during the up and down motion of the lift arms. I experienced binding with the Cat2 PEC.

But Greenwells are very very good on the customer relations front. Just givem a call and they'll give you that measurement.

//greg//

I have never seen the PEC system in person or in I use, but to restate, there is too much hitch past the pin in some cases with the Cat 2 on the clevis style attachments? There is no width issues fitting in the "gap" to get to the pin?
 
   / Pat's Easy Change Vs Quick Hitch #56  
I have used the chinese quick hitch for a few years now and been happy with it but, with the tractor I have now, I have to take the 3 point arms off for the backhoe to be installed. I called pats and asked about the difference between the one they sell and the one they make for agri-supply, and I was told it was the same except they skip a machining process that gives it a more rounded look. The strenth and lock are the same. I bought the one from agri-supply and so far I am happy with it.
 
   / Pat's Easy Change Vs Quick Hitch #57  
I have never seen the PEC system in person or in I use, but to restate, there is too much hitch past the pin in some cases with the Cat 2 on the clevis style attachments? There is no width issues fitting in the "gap" to get to the pin?

I have seen the it be close but on testing through full range of motion no contact was ever made in our case.
 
   / Pat's Easy Change Vs Quick Hitch #58  
Has anyone used Pat's weld on version?

If you have how do you like it?

Can you send me or post some pics of the weld on version
 
   / Pat's Easy Change Vs Quick Hitch #59  
Has anyone used Pat's weld on version?

If you have how do you like it?

Can you send me or post some pics of the weld on version

Check post #43 the link to "Hitch Models". Near the bottom of the linked page is a pic of the weld on model.

Looks the same as the regular model without all of the securing hardware like U-bolts, clamps, etc. Much cleaner.
 
   / Pat's Easy Change Vs Quick Hitch #60  
Mudfarmer said:
My solution is a pat's, hydraulic toplink AND Harborfreight moving dollies (about ten bucks each) on a hard surfaced storage floor. I move the implement to the tractor with those rather than the other way around. Also helps me roll the implements in and out of corners for storage. I have at least two per implement now. Makes moving the log splitter a couple of inches to line up with the lift arms real easy.
Mf

That's funny. That's EXACTLY what I've done - hydraulic top link, Pat's and dollies. . I've made a custom dolly for each implement with those HF dollies, a couple of 2x4s and some screws. No busted knuckles and no money in the cuss bucket.
 
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

2002 FREIGHTLINER FL70 DUMP TRUCK (A51406)
2002 FREIGHTLINER...
JOHN DEERE 4730 LOT NUMBER 258 (A53084)
JOHN DEERE 4730...
2006 International 4300 Water Tanker Truck (A52384)
2006 International...
2014 MACK PINNACLE (A52472)
2014 MACK PINNACLE...
2016 GMC Sierra Pickup Truck, VIN # 1GTN1LEC5GZ901362 (A51572)
2016 GMC Sierra...
2022 ONYX RX34 FLOOR SWEEPER (A50458)
2022 ONYX RX34...
 
Top