PO'd at police

[MossRoad]

Moss, I really just want to point out that you cannot have it both ways. You can have total freedom, or you can have the state protect you. If you try to be in the middle, then the responsible pay for the irresponsible. You will also tend to turn the responsible into the irresponsible. This is what bothers me. I think we need to encourage people to be responsible for their own behavior. This means be prepared (as much as possible) to take care of yourself. The direction we are heading is everybody is working for the government or is on welfare. It will probably take a long time to get there, but it is a direction. I want to go the other way. What social changes can we make to encourage this.

I agree with you Bob. I do not have a clue as to how to make people responsible for their own choices. I do know that when they make bad choices it ends up costing all of us BECAUSE we as a society won't let people suffer. Maybe after they heal we can put them in jail! :laughing:

 

[buckeyefarmer]

so the moral of the story is to print yourself a little piece of paper that says you have insurance, since the officer isn't going to check to verify it. Cause if the officer is going to check and verify it, you wouldn't need to have the little piece of paper in the first place. :laughing:

 

[dave1949]

so the moral of the story is to print yourself a little piece of paper that says you have insurance, since the officer isn't going to check to verify it. Cause if the officer is going to check and verify it, you wouldn't need to have the little piece of paper in the first place. :laughing:

Won't work. You are tryng to apply logic where none is recognized Gov't processes are extremely an*l. They will check, and then cite you for something else too. :laughing:
Dave.

 

[Alan L.]

I'm with HP on this. To have to show up for court when it can so easily be proven that insurance was in effect is ridiculous. How much trouble this is depends on where you are. Lets take the City of Dallas. Its not like the small town JP where you wait maybe an hour while others have their days in court. I had a ticket in Dallas last year and had to show up in downtown Dallas muncipal court building at 8:30 in the morning. First of all, you don't just drive to downtown dallas at 8:30 because of the ridiculous traffic. To be certain of getting there on time you have to get there early, like 7:30 or 7:45. Then it is next to impossible to find a parking space. I then walk from my car to the municipal building, a couple of blocks, and stand in line on the steps outside the door, to get through security. When I finally get there I am sent packing to to a small pocket knife that I always have on me. Take it back to the car and start over. Finally figure out what court room to go to and wait for an hour while NOTHING happens. A couple of lawyers showed up to see if any of the 40 or so people were his clients. Then the judge calls a recess for another hour so this is turning out to be an ALL DAY DEAL! I left and went back to my office, called my lawyer (who was meeting me there anyway) and told him to get what he could. Fortunately I got a letter in a couple of days that my case had been dismissed. But imagine if I was just waiting to show an insurance card!!!


The seat belt law will only make sense whenever motorcycles are outlawed. Who do you think is safer, someone on a motorcycle, or someone in a 2-ton pickup without a seatbelt? Ironically the only seat belt violation I ever got was from a motorcycle cop. Go figure.

But its not really the cop's fault, its just procedure that he has to follow.

 

[Hawghauler]

Incrementally rules have been imposed on us slowly, under our radar so as to not wake up the sheeple and have us turn into a torch bearing mob with pitchforks. Most of the rules we did not ask for, but they are well intentioned to modify our behavior for our own good. If we let it slide, the next rule will come, and you may not be okay with that one, or the next, and the next. Louisianna there was a sheriff that was confiscating guns (for your own good), took years of court action to stop it. Too much rain and FEMA can suspend your rights and drive you from your land (for your own good). A few years back Vermont imposed a law which prohibited land owners from timbering more than 40 acres of their own land (for the good of the state). The property owners closed their land to hikers, snowmobilers, etc and objected heavily. Seriously threatened tourism. I think the law dissappeared when the masses challenged it. If you don't like the law, fight it in court as is your right. I am not a smoker, but I don't like the bans in many places. I don't like insurance or seatbelt laws, but I wear them and buy it out of personal responsibility. I don't use drugs, but I despise the drug testing laws imposed on truckers by the DoT. The only gun law I agree with is that which bars felons from possesion. Free men have the right to be annoyed by government imposed restrictions. But if you don't challenge the charges every time, then you should be PO'd at yourself.

 

[Hawghauler]

I hear there is a political ban. I'll tone down my favorite subject.

 

[The Haymaker]

I robbed a bank yesterday with a fake gun. Nobody was hurt. Now I write this from Shawshank.

Those 45 cops and the SWAT team could've just let me go because no one was hurt. I really think they went overboard and now they need to waste all this money on my food and housing.

Where it was my first heist, they should have just let me go.

 

[dmccarty]

At first I thought we disagreed but then I read ("Finally the officer can decide, which is discretion, to always write a citation.") So I guess we do agree.

There are probably some 'officers' who would ALWAYS write a ticket but only those very inexperienced or very 'chicken shid' would not realize that a warning ticket is within their discretion and counts for the same 'violator contact' as a citation to court.

No we disagree. Officer do not always have discretion. I listed why this might be the case. Also I mentioned why the officer might have chosen to have written a citation instead of a warning. The latter is within his discretion but there are danged good reasons for the officer to just right the citation.

Calling the officer in question "****** ***" is just low class.

Later,
Dan

 

[MF1652]

Came in for lunch from raking hay today to find this thread. ***! I see the cop haters are out in force on this one. A vast majority of the responses to this thread were from people who have no idea what they are talking about. Their responses were steered by innacurate beliefs of how they think LEO's operate. Every department in this country has to follow the laws of their state. Each departmnet then has to follow their own policies which are more stringent than that of state law and constitutional constriants that the Police have to operate by. What little discretion LEO's have these days is often stripped away by a supervisor being given orders to produce stats. (yeah I know that isn't right, but lets not get into a discussion over that). The fact remains, the LEO conducted a lawful stop, and wrote two citations. Petty or not, the LEO was doing the job the community pays him to do with your tax dollors. Last time I checked this was TBN. Save this trash for another web forum. I browse this site to trade information about tractors. Is it so hard to keep personal problems separate?

 

[dave1949]

Came in for lunch from raking hay today to find this thread. ***! I see the cop haters are out in force on this one. A vast majority of the responses to this thread were from people who have no idea what they are talking about. Their responses were steered by innacurate beliefs of how they think LEO's operate. Every department in this country has to follow the laws of their state. Each departmnet then has to follow their own policies which are more stringent than that of state law and constitutional constriants that the Police have to operate by. What little discretion LEO's have these days is often stripped away by a supervisor being given orders to produce stats. (yeah I know that isn't right, but lets not get into a discussion over that). The fact remains, the LEO conducted a lawful stop, and wrote two citations. Petty or not, the LEO was doing the job the community pays him to do with your tax dollors. Last time I checked this was TBN. Save this trash for another web forum. I browse this site to trade information about tractors. Is it so hard to keep personal problems separate?

Well, I guess that makes you the self-appointed censor? You did read the thread name I hope before you dived into the trash yourself?
Dave.