Let me back up a little bit. I'm just agreeing with you that three laminated 2x6's are stronger then a solid 6x6's on the basis that both are more then strong enough to do the job and it doesn't matter which one is actually stronger.
Secondly, I would never use three 2x6's instead of a 6x6 for anything. It's too small of an amount to matter to me and my name when building something. I've never met a client who complained about using the best materials I know of.
Catching up again on this post and I have to completely disagree with you here.
Laminated 2x6s is BETTER than a single 6x6, which is why it's getting popular. If I was building pole barns with my name on it, it would certainly be with laminated posts. I'm not sure why you think it's cheapening out, a 6x6x12' SYP laminated post is $48 from Menards, an AC2 6x6 most people use is 37.83.
First, let's take the bottom part... which is often the only treated part in these composite posts as it's all you need, and then you don't worry about corrosion to everything steel near the upper part of the post. The 2x6s being 1/3rd the depth are treated 100% through to refusal, versus the 6x6 which due to its depth, has often not taken treatment all the way through. This is why when you cut a 6x6, you paint treatment on the end.
Now the upper part. If you've ever bought a 6x6, or a few at a time, and not IMMEDIATELY used them... you'll see them twist and bend fairly quickly. The laminated posts have differing woodgrain, and ideally alignment, so it's much more dimensionally stable. You can also build straight, strong and long posts much more easily with spliced pieces, which on a 14' sidewall building may not be too important, but consider the gable ends of a taller building could have posts that are quite tall.