Chipper pto driven wood chippers

   / pto driven wood chippers #61  
5030,

Close, it's a MS250 w/ a 16" bar. My other chainsaw is a Husky Rancher 260 w/ a 24" bar. Both have aggressive chains (no kickback protection feature). I'll keep that in mind about the handle. With the scabbard, the saw should either be sheathed or in my hands.

You must have a 50+ hp tractor. Mine's only a 35 hp and it seems to be just right for it.
 
   / pto driven wood chippers #62  
5030,

Close, it's a MS250 w/ a 16" bar. My other chainsaw is a Husky Rancher 260 w/ a 24" bar. Both have aggressive chains (no kickback protection feature). I'll keep that in mind about the handle. With the scabbard, the saw should either be sheathed or in my hands.

You must have a 50+ hp tractor. Mine's only a 35 hp and it seems to be just right for it.

I have mine on a 90 pto output Kubota, way, way more than it needs to operate. I'm always cautious about inputting too much power, in fact, I run the pto at half speed most of the time. To get added air to the flywheel / fan at reduced RPM, I opened up the knife bolt access plate so it sucks in more air. That seems to work well. I clog it rarely and usually the clog is at the transition of the flywheel housing and the chute so it's easy to unclog.

For a 'Onehunglow' chipper it's not bad.....:laughing:
 
   / pto driven wood chippers #63  
You should run it at 540. I believe it was designed to run at that speed so that the chips gets ejected properly. Doesn't yours have torque protection? Mine does on my PTP shaft and it broke twice from revving it too quickly.
 
   / pto driven wood chippers #64  
You should run it at 540. I believe it was designed to run at that speed so that the chips gets ejected properly. Doesn't yours have torque protection? Mine does on my PTP shaft and it broke twice from revving it too quickly.

Why? So long as there is sufficent air flow (by modifying the intake of air) flywheel speed is irrevelant. The infeed rollers control the feed rate, not the flywheel speed. I can see running at 540 with marginal horsepower but I have 3 times input power, no need. I do run a weasler slip clutch to insure that I don't destroy the driveline (on the chipper). been running at half speed for years now with no issues.

I bring mine up from idle slowly, all the time. Why shock load the chipper or the pto with a slam in at speed. Makes no sense.
 
   / pto driven wood chippers #65  
I guess what works for you will,... work. It's not the feed rate, but the flywheel. My thinking is wouldn't it be more efficient to use inertia to your benefit at 540 than to sacrifice some to straight power? Kind of like jump starting a car with a dead battery, you let the "business end" do the work (charged battery / flywheel) than relying too much on the transfer of power ((cables / PTO shaft). I'm no engineer and I could be way off but it's what I understand how the chipper functions.

The first time, I engaged my electronic pto at higher revs and I erred. Second was revving it up too quickly. Of course, it makes no sense to shock it. Like you, I engage at the slowest engine speed and rev it up slowly.
 
   / pto driven wood chippers #66  
Sometimes the manufacturer wants you to engage at higher RPM's... for using the rotary cutter on my machine the manual directs to engage around 1500... there a 175 pound flywheel to get turning on the chipper, but relatively little resistance. I suppose for smaller machines heavy drivelines/flywheels present the possibility of lugging the motor at idle. My knockoff machine needs to be near rated speed for wet conifers to reliably clear the chute, but can blow drier/harder/less sticky material at lower speeds. Doesn't need to be said, but eye, hand and hearing protection are not really not optional using a chipper. Super loud, super dirty, super dangerous--PPE is a must.
 
   / pto driven wood chippers #67  
Just my .02

After using a chipper for numerous hours in a day a couple days in a row, get one with some type of feed. I am not familiar with the mentioned mechanical feed brought up in the first page nor have I looked it up. If your budget allows, get hydraulic feed or look into that mechanical feed. I can tell you manually putting tree limbs gets old real fast leaving you sore. To be able to just toss in and walk away would be fantastic !!! Again, budget can be an issue but but worth it in time and health.

Sorry, I missed a couple pages here but after page one and two I wanted to add my experience. If this is a long term investment, do it right. Research, purchase and move forward.
 
   / pto driven wood chippers #68  
After using a chipper for numerous hours in a day a couple days in a row, get one with some type of feed. I am not familiar with the mentioned mechanical feed brought up in the first page nor have I looked it up. If your budget allows, get hydraulic feed or look into that mechanical feed. I can tell you manually putting tree limbs gets old real fast leaving you sore. To be able to just toss in and walk away would be fantastic !!!

If you are having that much issue with manual feed the issue is likely that the blades need sharpening. With my chipper when the blades are sharp anything without a stiff crotch self feeds. The main issue is putting something too tough in and having to jerk it out to keep from stalling.
 
   / pto driven wood chippers #69  
If you are having that much issue with manual feed the issue is likely that the blades need sharpening. With my chipper when the blades are sharp anything without a stiff crotch self feeds. The main issue is putting something too tough in and having to jerk it out to keep from stalling.
I'm sure that's part of the case, but either way, now knowing what I know through experience, I would spring for hydro feed
 
   / pto driven wood chippers #70  
I'm sure that's part of the case, but either way, now knowing what I know through experience, I would spring for hydro feed

We'll have to disagree on that one. After using my manual feed chipper for over 10 years I can't see the point in power feed for homeowner use. For professionals with heavy usage, sure. But not for occasional use. It's not needed in my view, costs more, and provides more moving parts to fail.
 
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

2018 Toyota RAV4 Hybrid XLE AWD SUV (A50324)
2018 Toyota RAV4...
2020 Massey Ferguson 1840 Small Square Baler - High-Performance Hay Baler (A51039)
2020 Massey...
2015 Ford Escape AWD SUV (A50324)
2015 Ford Escape...
CAT FORKS W/ QUICK COUPLER (A50854)
CAT FORKS W/ QUICK...
2017 Ford F-450 Crew Cab Knapheide Service Truck (A49461)
2017 Ford F-450...
2012 LINDE H80D FORKLIFT (A50854)
2012 LINDE H80D...
 
Top