Henro:
Maybe we are missing each other on this. To start the tractor, tranny must be in neutral, PTO disengaged and clutch depressed. I was talking about the interlock that kills the engine if you dismount.
I THINK that the 2910 has the same interlock as the
B7800; i.e. once you have started the engine, and engaged the PTO, if you leave the tractor seat without tipping it forward w/in couple of seconds of getting up, the engine dies.
The purpose of this, obviously, is to make it impossible for the operator to inadvertently leave the PTO running while dismounting the tractor. The seat tipping override allows the operator to leave the PTO running while dismounting providing he tips the seat forward, a presumably deliberate act.
Doesn't your
B2910 have that?
You are quite correct that if (1) the PTO is not engaged and (2) the transmission is not engaged either, then the engine will continue to run when you get off, without your needing to tip the seat forward. That is because the only two hazards that the seat cut-out switch is designed to protect against are (1) accidentally coming into contact with moving PTO attachments and (2) having the tractor moving with no operator.
I take it that, whether there is a safety switch that kills the engine or not, it wouldn't be a good practice to dismount the tractor without being aware that the PTO is engaged. Likewise that it is prudent to require the dismounting operator to do something to make sure that if the engine continues to run with the PTO engaged, the operator is aware of it and it is a deliberate choice.
With a
chipper/shredder or a log splitter, you have to dismount the tractor to operate the attachment, unless you have a second person to operate it, and therefore you have to have some way to enable the engine and PTO to continue running. Killing the engine unless the operator tips the seat forward is Kubota's way of accomplishing this when necessary, while avoiding allowing the operator to leave the seat without being aware that the PTO is engaged.
Some months ago there was a thread in which some people expressed the view that the cut-out safety switch was a nuisance and should be overriden so that you could dismount a tractor with engine and PTO running without bothering to tip the seat forward. I still think that that is not a good idea and that having to tip the seat isn't much of an inconvenience for protection against inadvertently dismounting while the PTO is running.
...which brings me back to my point about the PHD: I can't conceive of a situation where I would be comfortable dismounting a tractor with an engaged PHD and I hope nobody else would be either since I can't imagine a good reason for wanting to do so.