DeereMann
Platinum Member
"Several companies are producing engines that meet EPA standards without urea systems, already, and it's only a matter of time before they all do."
I don't believe this is accurate. The reason that 'others do' was for lower mileage engines that didn't need the fuel efficieny. It is well known you don't need SCR if you don't create the NOx. The way you don't create the NOx without an SCR is by severely retarding the fuel injection timing & adding EGR. Then your fuel mileage goes way, way down. Ask Navistar how that worked out for them (now buying Cummins engines). Heck, CAT got out of the on highway truck business for that reason.
And finally, Cummins first ISB6.7 (Ram) engine recipe had no SCR - but the fuel consumption was so high & they got so many complaints they changed to SCR a few years back just to get the mileage up.
Reducing NOx is not that simple. Gasoline spark ignited engines don't make nearly the NOx that diesels do - because they aren't as efficient, they don't burn as hot.
I don't believe this is accurate. The reason that 'others do' was for lower mileage engines that didn't need the fuel efficieny. It is well known you don't need SCR if you don't create the NOx. The way you don't create the NOx without an SCR is by severely retarding the fuel injection timing & adding EGR. Then your fuel mileage goes way, way down. Ask Navistar how that worked out for them (now buying Cummins engines). Heck, CAT got out of the on highway truck business for that reason.
And finally, Cummins first ISB6.7 (Ram) engine recipe had no SCR - but the fuel consumption was so high & they got so many complaints they changed to SCR a few years back just to get the mileage up.
Reducing NOx is not that simple. Gasoline spark ignited engines don't make nearly the NOx that diesels do - because they aren't as efficient, they don't burn as hot.