Rear blade technique and whether hydraulics are really needed

   / Rear blade technique and whether hydraulics are really needed
  • Thread Starter
#11  
For tilt, I use the side link crank on the tractor. Actually I used to use the crank, but now I do it with hydraulics. I don't make that adjustment on the blade itself. With the blade angled toward the center of the drive and the trailing edge slightly raised it does a nice job of creating a crown.

Interesting, haven't tried that, somehow didn't think it would have much effect. I'm getting a picture of what I think you mean though. So (1) go backward, blade in normal forward face, (2) angle one side of blade horizontally to guide material to center, (3) adjust 3ph side link for a bit of angle, (4) go sloooow
 
   / Rear blade technique and whether hydraulics are really needed #12  
So I have the Landpride RB3784 6-way blade, 7 feet wide, and no rear hydraulics. When researching my buy, naturally the popular concensus on TBN was that you want the top-n-tilt, the more hydraulics for road maintenance tools the better, basically. However I'd reached my limit, and had to rule it out.

There are four things I want to do with my rear blade to manage my long dirt/gravel driveway:

  1. Maintain drainage ditches
  2. Maintain crown of the gravel surface
  3. Scoop material (gravel) toward the center of the driveway from edges
  4. Generally smooth the surface (remove dips)

My ditch work is ugly, but mostly working. Getting the blade to dig in and move (though not necessarily _remove_) material to the side of the driveway is not a problem, though sometimes changing the position of the heavy blade arm is challenging (since it weighs more than I do).

My problem is more about the blade digging in when I do NOT want it dig. For example, I may have the blade positioned to do a reasonable scoop-from-side activity, but it's completely sensitive to dips/non-level driveway surface. So the blade position that worked when the tractor was level is now digging up my yard when the tractor is not level. It's like I need some kind of "float" for the blade. (For this reason, 95% of all my leveling has been with my bucket on float - and not the blade).

Same for smoothing the surface. If you have even the slightest dip in the surface, then one pair of wheels in the tractor enters the dip, and the blade is either too far up (front tires dipped), or too far down (rear tires dipped), and now you're just digging _new_ dips.

Then there's scooping material. If you offset the blade by swinging the arm to the side, there is some kind of slope bias in that action even if you haven't angled the blade. In fact, I need to angle the blade in the toward the center of the driveway to correct for it. E.g. I use the swing arm to place the blade to the far right of the tractor, and angle the blade horizontally so that the right edge leads to direct gravel toward the center. Those two actions seem to make the blade angle down vertically, enough that sometimes I must correct, or it will ditch when I want it just to scoop materials centerward.

No doubt the above problems are all at least partly because I'm new at this, I can't stress my noobishness enough. But I am getting practice, and the blade just continues to thwart my every goal for it beyond digging ditches. I know a box blade would be better for smoothing, but I'm not sure it would help with scooping and crowning. And I am having ZERO luck getting a crown, because if I get a proper side-to-side angle on the blade so that the mid of the driveway will be higher than the edge of the driveway, then the blade will be digging up my yard on every dip, unlevel wheel footing and so on.

  • Is it hopeless to do this stuff without hydraulics to fine tune pitch and such while moving?
  • Am I using the wrong tool for the job?
  • Is there a "float" for the 3PH like there is for the bucket that I simply don't know about?

I've also played with the angle of the blade with respect to toplink adjustments and aggressiveness of material, i.e. short toplink to "smooth", long toplink to be more aggressive with the bottom of the blade. Even when it's very short it's still pretty aggressive and doesn't function well for smoothing.

I'm mostly smoothing tailgate dropped gravel right now. The truck invariably drops it deeper than I like, and sometimes wider/narrower than I like. So not only do I need to crown it, but I also need to get it from point where it's too thick to point B where it's too thin, and mostly I drag with the bucket on float to do that, since any attempt to use the bucket to scoop it up and move it would make a far larger mess. (Since the tailgate result isn't too bad, just too think where it's deposited).

Maybe the answer is just more practice and "stepwise refinement", i.e. get the driveway level, _then_ crown, etc, but my best approximations at "level" are also easily felt as bumps when driving across it.

Looking for advice on techniques, tooling, etc. I'm starting to think some kind of blade with wheels on it might have been better. Don't really know.

[Addendum, in general, I also spend way more time raking gravel by hand, and clearing debris from ditches by hand, than I would like. I was hoping the tractor was going to help more in this regard. Where I can ditch with the bucket it's great, but ditching with the rear blade leaves all kinds of stuff I have to shovel out, and I have to use the blade where it's too tight to position the tractor perpindicular to the driveway because of trees]

Many of the issues you describe as your areas of difficulty are the very reasons so many people recommend a TNT. Each issues you expressed can be dealt with without the TNT, but require manual adjustments that take time out of the seat.
Yes it can be done.
Yes the more you use the blade and learn/understand how it responds the better you will do, but without the TNT there will always be the need for some manual adjustments of the tilt and top link. With the TNT, these are made much like adjusting the height of the entire 3PH. Of course unless you go with a full hydraulic setup, the swing of the blade arm (offset of the arm) and the angle of the blade will continue to be a manual adjustment, however these are less frequently adjusted than the TNT.
 
   / Rear blade technique and whether hydraulics are really needed #13  
Good tips, thanks. I wouldn't have thought about reversing the blade to take advantage of the surface just processed by the blade. Any advice for the blade settings or other techniques you use to achieve a crown? If I use the blade angle (i.e. tip one corner lower with the rear bolt", those are fixed at 7.5 degree increments, which seems too steep for an 8-ish foot driveway. However at, say, 1/2 inch per foot of width, that's only a 4 degree grade, not 7.5, and is probably also part of the reason I'm digging up turf (that was another place I thought hydraulics might offer more granularity).

Changing the length of the top link increases/decreases tilt of the moldboard when angled.

When the blade is sitting on the ground the main beam should be level front to rear.
 
   / Rear blade technique and whether hydraulics are really needed #14  
Am I understanding that you haven't changed the length of your right side link using the crank?
 
   / Rear blade technique and whether hydraulics are really needed
  • Thread Starter
#15  
Changing the length of the top link increases/decreases tilt of the moldboard when angled.

When the blade is sitting on the ground the main beam should be level front to rear.

I've played with the top link in this regard, but given the other factors and blade engagement it hasn't made much difference. For example, I can have the toplink fully shortened so the blade is in the least aggressive stance, but any slight variability in the road surface encountered by any rear tire and the blade will instantly be too deep in the rocks.

Some of the other suggestions will hopefully work a bit better for me, we'll see. I have plenty of practicing left to do :)
 
   / Rear blade technique and whether hydraulics are really needed
  • Thread Starter
#16  
Am I understanding that you haven't changed the length of your right side link using the crank?

I had been adjusting the side link so that when the blade was sitting on the floor the 3PH engagement with the blade mount was level. Didn't really occur to me to use it when the blade had its own angling support (which whose 7.5 degree increments I'm finding too severe except for ditch work). So that's another thing for me to try.
 
   / Rear blade technique and whether hydraulics are really needed #17  
I've played with the top link in this regard, but given the other factors and blade engagement it hasn't made much difference. For example, I can have the toplink fully shortened so the blade is in the least aggressive stance, but any slight variability in the road surface encountered by any rear tire and the blade will instantly be too deep in the rocks.

Some of the other suggestions will hopefully work a bit better for me, we'll see. I have plenty of practicing left to do :)

You sure about that ??
 
   / Rear blade technique and whether hydraulics are really needed
  • Thread Starter
#18  
I had been adjusting the side link so that when the blade was sitting on the floor the 3PH engagement with the blade mount was level. Didn't really occur to me to use it when the blade had its own angling support (which whose 7.5 degree increments I'm finding too severe except for ditch work). So that's another thing for me to try.

Also, I don't know about your "crank", but my side link can be adjusted only when the 3ph is not under load, i.e. blade is down. Maybe I'm doing it wrong, noob rules apply.
 
   / Rear blade technique and whether hydraulics are really needed #19  
I've played with the top link in this regard, but given the other factors and blade engagement it hasn't made much difference. For example, I can have the toplink fully shortened so the blade is in the least aggressive stance, but any slight variability in the road surface encountered by any rear tire and the blade will instantly be too deep in the rocks.

Some of the other suggestions will hopefully work a bit better for me, we'll see. I have plenty of practicing left to do :)

Now we are talking about two different things.

I was referring to your comment about the tilt of the blade changing when angled. To keep the same blade tilt when angled or straight the top link needs to be adjusted until the main beam sits flat front to rear.

The amount of tilt is best addressed by changing the length of your right side link which you can do from the driver's seat and on the move.

You are referring to the blade's aggressive nature. That is best controlled with a gauge wheel.
 
   / Rear blade technique and whether hydraulics are really needed
  • Thread Starter
#20  
Now we are talking about two different things.

I was referring to your comment about the tilt of the blade changing when angled. To keep the same blade tilt when angled or straight the top link needs to be adjusted until the main beam sits flat front to rear.

The amount of tilt is best addressed by changing the length of your right side link which you can do from the driver's seat and on the move.

You are referring to the blade's aggressive nature. That is best controlled with a gauge wheel.

Okay, gotcha, I think.
 
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

2019 FREIGHTLINER CASCADIA SLEEPER (A43004)
2019 FREIGHTLINER...
Heavy-Duty 4-Wheel Rolling Warehouse Cart  74in x 32in (A46877)
Heavy-Duty 4-Wheel...
2010 American Eagle B45 RV (A47484)
2010 American...
2025 Wolverine SP-15-84W Skid Steer Snow Pusher (A47484)
2025 Wolverine...
2025 AllMetal K0720 UNUSED 20 ft. Bi-Parting Metal (A47484)
2025 AllMetal...
20 ft. Shipping Container (A47484)
20 ft. Shipping...
 
Top