There is a quick and legal method to get whatever is desired. At a pedigreed Holstein cattle sale. watched a buyer purchase 12 head of cows and loaded his Ohio trailer .The amount of close to 100 thousand bucks. check verified with bank as legal and left the sale. before he returned to his place of business was a lawyers office. and declared bankruptcy .
When the check bounced owner found out ,Could not touch or in any way bother the theif had full goverment protection
we stopped at his barn about 6 months later and he called sherrif who told us to get off property and not return.or we would be cited for disturbance.illegal entry . the cattle died of old age and still no payment .
2nd example. a person i knew had business of hydroseeding large areas Golf coarses and highway right of wayss. One eveniong came to my home with sad story of his equipment and truck stolen from work area. wanted to borrow money to purchase new truck and hydroseeder equipment and when insurance paid he would return. except visited a lawyer and bankruptcy blocked any attempt to recover the money.
Judge kindly explained I coud do nothing to hinder his activities. or attempt to recover any money. legalized theft backed by our legal system.
This is in total close to 200 thousand bucks just my experance. Now look in daily news papers of bankruptcy and see how many is being made.
My Father repeatly said never trust a Lawyer or Banker and watch the Judges . and if talking together some one is losing his money.
You do realize those are civil matters and not criminal, you could sue, now whether its worth it or you have a leg to stand on is another matter. Now I would sympathize in your case and to a point somewhat agree that those are flat out theft.
The problem with the legal system or what people dont understand is the legal system is designed to be fair and balance, yes I know it can be backwards and often times can favor the wrong party. But in your case' the legal system has no choice but to conclude at the onset that both you the plaintiff and defendant in this case' are both telling the truth, whether you like it or not or think you are right. The investigation/trial will then attempt to see who was right. The legal system isnt perfect but it' set up the way it is for a reason, unfortunately not every single situation is going to be figured out for somebody, even when somebody loses 100k.
In your cases I wouldnt transfer property off a personal check, and wouldnt be loaning 100k to anybody and if I did there would be a contract. IMO if people transfer anything of value without a firm paper trail they are just as wrong.
Last edited: