First we are talking about two different situations. The one I quoted is clear and outright theft and would most likely lead to charges being filed against the person who wrote the check. The other is a bit different but was still handled in the wrong manner. Sounds as if the shop doing the work wasn’t following all thier obligations to the contract they had with the tractor manufacture and trying to take money outside the parameters of what I am assuming the contract was. Stopping payment wasn’t the correct or legal way to resolve the issue but rather just a way to avoid dealing with the problem the correct and legal way.
If they did that today the police would be able to charge them with theft because they agreed to pay for the work and have no legal standing. In order to get thier money back and recover the cost they would need to pay the bill and then file suit against the dealership and tractor manufacture for any breach of contract based on the written warranty that came with the original purchase of the tractor.
Yes it sucks having the machine tied up if your unwilling to pay the money and have to wait till it’s resolved but in a law suit against the dealer and manufacturer if it is determined that they are in breach of the contract, that money will be part of the settlement and be returned.
In your scenario the crook is actually the dealer but in the manner it’s handled the victim actually breaks other laws and we have all heard it many times “two wrongs don’t make a right”
If they did that today the police would be able to charge them with theft because they agreed to pay for the work and have no legal standing. In order to get thier money back and recover the cost they would need to pay the bill and then file suit against the dealership and tractor manufacture for any breach of contract based on the written warranty that came with the original purchase of the tractor.
Yes it sucks having the machine tied up if your unwilling to pay the money and have to wait till it’s resolved but in a law suit against the dealer and manufacturer if it is determined that they are in breach of the contract, that money will be part of the settlement and be returned.
In your scenario the crook is actually the dealer but in the manner it’s handled the victim actually breaks other laws and we have all heard it many times “two wrongs don’t make a right”