Doughknob
Veteran Member
Huh? Data changed? Where did u discover that?Figure it out...YOU ARE THE ONE MISSING THE FACTS...the data was changed...what is it you don't understand about this fact ???
Huh? Data changed? Where did u discover that?Figure it out...YOU ARE THE ONE MISSING THE FACTS...the data was changed...what is it you don't understand about this fact ???
Humans have always had a propensity to run off half cocked and do incredibly stupid destructive and expensive thingsGovernments are mandating lower sulphur contents because sulphur compounds are bad for the environment.
That argument cuts both ways. the people doing the so-called research on anthropogenic climate change are literally taking grant money designed to produce specifically the results the so-called researchers generate.
If you don't know what I'm referring to...it is you that is misinformed and are in denial...!Huh? Data changed? Where did u discover that?
What?...you're seeking moral support ?...the only place you'll get it is from other gullible souls...!Rate. Rate. Rate.
oh, that might be a little over the top.It is absolutely amazing to me how people think that scientist are all part of a secret evil underground society that is conspiring to trick people into thinking climate change is real.
www.minds.com
I do believe the Bugatti will wipe the road with any Tesla for top end. I cannot afford either actually. My 'super car' is my Ford Focus ST Turbo 6 speed. Bought it off lease for 12 grand. My kind of price.Well, what do u mean by fun? The Model S Plaid beats the Veyron to 60mph and also by almost a second in the quarter mile. To me that is more fun. I guess i’d agree the Bugatti looks better if that is your type of panty party……
Why oversize DPF or course.How would you put emissions on a volcano ? They are and have always been the biggest polluter on the planet! Eruptions happen 24/7/365! I'm just saying.
Easy peasy. Just build a great big ocean over top of it. Maybe recruit Beavers.How would you put emissions on a volcano ?
just not this oneI do believe the Bugatti will wipe the road with any Tesla for top end.
Short version is this: the monitoring sites failed to properly handle the fact that the local area changed (like grassy areas developed into concrete). This overstated changes globally and was further exaggerated by applying those skewed results to unchanged sites.Huh? Data changed? Where did u discover that?
This is the first time I have heard this claim. What data was falsified? It seems pretty clear to me, and has for years.Figure it out...YOU ARE THE ONE MISSING THE FACTS...the data was changed...what is it you don't understand about this fact ???
Ah. It's a secret. No wonder I had not heard of it.If you don't know what I'm referring to...it is you that is misinformed and are in denial...!
That is all supposition. Dosen't matter hs uses idiotic words like proof. Scientists don't use language like that; Partisans and religious nuts do.This is the first time I have heard this claim. What data was falsified? It seems pretty clear to me, and has for years.
![]()
The Simple Proof of Man-Made Global Warming
The two most basic Smoking Guns proving that carbon from fossil fuels is warming the Earth.skeptoid.com
Ah. It's a secret. No wonder I had not heard of it.
wattsupwiththat.com