Gomer
Silver Member
Hey, Cool I don't have a backhoe!
Gomer said:Hey, Cool I don't have a backhoe!![]()
psdx said:...I kept saying I wasn't going to intrude into this thread, but in the end I guess I couldn't resist. It's been said that by shortening the ROPS Gomer's tractor is less safe that it was. It makes for interesting reading, and I'm not complaining at all - but Gomer has taken a fair amount of grief over his ROPS modification. So I felt that a counterpoint was in order.
According to the Kubota specs, the fixed ROPS version of the 2630 is 11.56" shorter than the folding ROPS version. By looking at the picture, Gomer's ROPS still looks taller than a fixed ROPS version. And he is still using the original material that was designed to carry the rollover load. So if the fixed ROPS is sufficient at 11.56" shorter than the folding ROPS, then why is Gomer's modification so unnacceptable if it's as tall or taller than the fixed ROPS? ...not intended as kindling- just trying to offer a view that hasn't been mentioned.
``````Toolguy said:1*It is my understanding that the B2630 or B3030 needs to have the taller, folding ROPS if the tractor is equipped with a Backhoe.
If a BH is not going to be used then the shorter, non-folding ROPS is sufficient.
2*I don't believe the extra height is any safer, it just gives the operator more headroom when setting on the BH seat.
3*I prefer the shorter ROPS on my B3030. It fits thru all my doors and I don't have to trim the trees around my yard as high. It is a factory, stock unit so I have confidence it will work as designed if needed.
psdx said:See page 7 of 22 in the PDF file here - contains dealer order sheets for Kubota B-Series http://www.dot.state.mn.us/equipment/contracts/tr_cpt_utl____shrt%20version/k%20b%20series.pdf
ehchvac said:who knew I was missing another rops cutting paranoia fest.
best description I've seen.LOL![]()