"At any rate, the cut quality for me running @ 2650 is so nice that IMO, there's no need to tax the engine/driveline/implement and me anymore than I need to."
The flaw in your reasoning is that running the engine at a lower RPM is better for it.
This is an incorrect assumption. It is higher torque, not higher speed, that is harder on the engine. Since power (what it takes to get the job done) is speed times torque, when you run the engine slower, you increase the torque.
It is much netter to run the engine at the higher speed and keep the torque as low as possible.
Yes, I am an engineer.
The flaw in your reasoning is that running the engine at a lower RPM is better for it.
This is an incorrect assumption. It is higher torque, not higher speed, that is harder on the engine. Since power (what it takes to get the job done) is speed times torque, when you run the engine slower, you increase the torque.
It is much netter to run the engine at the higher speed and keep the torque as low as possible.
Yes, I am an engineer.