sa324owner
Member
Here's something to consider about the likely lowered lift rating if you convert to an SSQA setup on an SA324...
I just reviewed the loader specifications (LL2300) for the LS MT225S you mentioned. Speaking *strictly* from a lifting capacity perspective, converting an SA324 to SSQA (with whatever weight that adds) may actually make the two tractor loaders nearly equal (SA324: 1,199lbs versus MT225S: 1,067lbs [all weights at pivot pins]).
I'll readily admit that proximity to a Yanmar dealer (< 3 miles), a loader capacity of 1,199lbs, and knowing the Yanmar name from childhood (we had a 240d) were the driving factors for my choice.
However, the overall specifications on the LL2300 suggest it is an ever-so-slightly larger (and dare I say better?) loader. It lifts a little higher, digs a little deeper, has a touch higher breakout force, slightly better dump/rollback angles, etc. It also includes SSQA capabilities.
I know that I use the loader for most jobs I do around my property where the tractor is involved. Loader capabilities were at the tippy-top of my requirements list. That being said, the MT225S with the LL2300 loader looks to be a slightly more capable machine on paper. Heck, another advantage for the LS is that it even has a Yanmar motor!
You'll know more about how pricing stacks up and what works for your situation, but in the spirit of being unbiased and looking for the best overall value, I think the LS has its merits and deserves fair consideration. I have no regrets about my choice, but If I were in the market and had Yanmar and LS dealers near me... it would be a tough decision.
I just reviewed the loader specifications (LL2300) for the LS MT225S you mentioned. Speaking *strictly* from a lifting capacity perspective, converting an SA324 to SSQA (with whatever weight that adds) may actually make the two tractor loaders nearly equal (SA324: 1,199lbs versus MT225S: 1,067lbs [all weights at pivot pins]).
I'll readily admit that proximity to a Yanmar dealer (< 3 miles), a loader capacity of 1,199lbs, and knowing the Yanmar name from childhood (we had a 240d) were the driving factors for my choice.
However, the overall specifications on the LL2300 suggest it is an ever-so-slightly larger (and dare I say better?) loader. It lifts a little higher, digs a little deeper, has a touch higher breakout force, slightly better dump/rollback angles, etc. It also includes SSQA capabilities.
I know that I use the loader for most jobs I do around my property where the tractor is involved. Loader capabilities were at the tippy-top of my requirements list. That being said, the MT225S with the LL2300 loader looks to be a slightly more capable machine on paper. Heck, another advantage for the LS is that it even has a Yanmar motor!
You'll know more about how pricing stacks up and what works for your situation, but in the spirit of being unbiased and looking for the best overall value, I think the LS has its merits and deserves fair consideration. I have no regrets about my choice, but If I were in the market and had Yanmar and LS dealers near me... it would be a tough decision.