JLD
Member
I agree, accident waiting to happen. I would not get anywhere near that thing.
Screw Type Log Splitter
- Thread starter BillyBoy
- Start date
- Views: 60947
ZJ_HR
Gold Member
Billy,
What kind of tractor do you have, and how big log do you want to split?
People here use 65 HP engine tractors to split logs 2 ft diameter. If log (stump side, for example) come to end of worm, and was not splitted, tractor sometimes stop (stuck). Recommended U-joint cross on PTO shaft is dia 32 mm or bigger (like for 80" tiller, for example). So, if you have small compact tractor, FORGET it. Look for hydraulic one. Safer, and you wil not broke pto on your tractor.
Two of neighbours have these splitters, and on both splitters input splined pto shafts are damaged (torsioned).
If you want, I can make you a photo.
ZJ
What kind of tractor do you have, and how big log do you want to split?
People here use 65 HP engine tractors to split logs 2 ft diameter. If log (stump side, for example) come to end of worm, and was not splitted, tractor sometimes stop (stuck). Recommended U-joint cross on PTO shaft is dia 32 mm or bigger (like for 80" tiller, for example). So, if you have small compact tractor, FORGET it. Look for hydraulic one. Safer, and you wil not broke pto on your tractor.
Two of neighbours have these splitters, and on both splitters input splined pto shafts are damaged (torsioned).
If you want, I can make you a photo.
ZJ
rambler
Veteran Member
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2003
- Messages
- 1,994
- Location
- MN
- Tractor
- Ford 960, 7700, TW20, 1720; IHC H, 300; Ollie S77
I won't say they are safe - neither is the chainsaw tho.
They flat out split a lot of wood.
I have run mine on a 15hp Kubota, 1720 NH, & old 960 ~50hp Ford. I always run at idle, and it will kill off the engine if it bites off more than it can chew. It splits wood plenty fast, no reason to run faster, & no need for big hp.
I have a BarkBuster. They use a pto shaft & run off the pto. The hyd setup with control on a hyd orbit motor someone mentioned is interesting, you could back it out & such. Interesting.
--->Paul
They flat out split a lot of wood.
I have run mine on a 15hp Kubota, 1720 NH, & old 960 ~50hp Ford. I always run at idle, and it will kill off the engine if it bites off more than it can chew. It splits wood plenty fast, no reason to run faster, & no need for big hp.
I have a BarkBuster. They use a pto shaft & run off the pto. The hyd setup with control on a hyd orbit motor someone mentioned is interesting, you could back it out & such. Interesting.
--->Paul
ZJ_HR
Gold Member
Paul,
Sorry for my bad English. I want to say that hydraulic push type log splitter is much safer than screw type.
People here use 99% screw type splitters, because they are CHEAP and fast.
A neighbor has 65HP Zetor, and when they try to split knoty oak log, about 25" or bigger, engine stops , even if they run engine at 1500 rpm (as him usually do). His splitter has torsioned shaft!!! /forums/images/graemlins/shocked.gif
Not so big problem for small logs, up to 12" dia, as you said.
BTW, I have drawings for manufacture of screw type splitter, so if somebody is interested, drop me a message.
ZJ
Sorry for my bad English. I want to say that hydraulic push type log splitter is much safer than screw type.
People here use 99% screw type splitters, because they are CHEAP and fast.
A neighbor has 65HP Zetor, and when they try to split knoty oak log, about 25" or bigger, engine stops , even if they run engine at 1500 rpm (as him usually do). His splitter has torsioned shaft!!! /forums/images/graemlins/shocked.gif
Not so big problem for small logs, up to 12" dia, as you said.
BTW, I have drawings for manufacture of screw type splitter, so if somebody is interested, drop me a message.
ZJ
MikeIA
Silver Member
A recent Farm Show magazine had one of these that someone had converted to hydraulic drive and mounted on the quick-tach bracket of his skid loader forks. I think it was on a hinge, so that the forks could be rotated into position to stop the log from spinning. He could back it out if he bit off more than it would chew by reversing the hydraulic motor. I think it also mentioned screwing the splitter in part way, then lifting the log to move it around.
edv
Bronze Member
Unless I am completely wrong....the screw splitter was introduced in the late 70's....shortly thereafter it was removed from the market....SUPER DANGEROUS....not sure...I imagine it did not take long for someone to get hurt or killed by this attachment...and surely NO insurance company would even consider writing liability insurance on this attachment...My advice buy your wood or buy a hydraulic splitter built by a reputable manufacturer...
edv
edv
</font><font color="blue" class="small">( I have a BarkBuster. They use a pto shaft ...)</font>
Paul, I was curious about the BarkBuster, so I did a search to see it...one of the first things I saw was a link to its recall .
Be Safe!
Sam
Paul, I was curious about the BarkBuster, so I did a search to see it...one of the first things I saw was a link to its recall .
Be Safe!
Sam
slowzuki
Elite Member
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2003
- Messages
- 4,100
- Location
- New Brunswick, Canada
- Tractor
- Kubota L5030 HSTC, MF 5455, Kubota M120, Allis Chalmers 7010
The lack of kill switch or shut off seems to be the biggest trouble.
I can see the one mounted on the quick tach attacking a big pile of firewood jabbing the spinning spike into it while the operator lets of heinous noises! Imagine the workover you could do to some ones car?
Ken
I can see the one mounted on the quick tach attacking a big pile of firewood jabbing the spinning spike into it while the operator lets of heinous noises! Imagine the workover you could do to some ones car?
Ken
MikefromMI
Silver Member
When I was a kid I got hung up in one. /forums/images/graemlins/shocked.gif
The process gets you in the habit of setting the end of the log over the bar so you know it won't spin. But as the tip gets worn over time, you have to push the log harder to get it started. When I was pressing a log in I didn't realize that my knee wasn't right behind the cone. It was closer to the bar. At the same time it had gripped and started to split. Before I took the pressure off my knee the log twisted as it was splitting which brought the log inside the bar and wedged my leg in there hard enough to lift a side of the 9N off the ground a good inch and stall it. If the log wouldn't have been split as far as it was I would have never got out. Fortuantly I had a sledge setting there and was able to free myself with a couple swats. My mom made dad get rid of it the next day........ But I feel they work great other than the feed. Take the human out of that and I think there would be different attitudes. I'd still rather use a ram into the spinning cone than a fixed wedge. /forums/images/graemlins/tongue.gif Sorry so long. Brought up a forgotten memory....
The process gets you in the habit of setting the end of the log over the bar so you know it won't spin. But as the tip gets worn over time, you have to push the log harder to get it started. When I was pressing a log in I didn't realize that my knee wasn't right behind the cone. It was closer to the bar. At the same time it had gripped and started to split. Before I took the pressure off my knee the log twisted as it was splitting which brought the log inside the bar and wedged my leg in there hard enough to lift a side of the 9N off the ground a good inch and stall it. If the log wouldn't have been split as far as it was I would have never got out. Fortuantly I had a sledge setting there and was able to free myself with a couple swats. My mom made dad get rid of it the next day........ But I feel they work great other than the feed. Take the human out of that and I think there would be different attitudes. I'd still rather use a ram into the spinning cone than a fixed wedge. /forums/images/graemlins/tongue.gif Sorry so long. Brought up a forgotten memory....
