In general, I think that bank's (not just the bank I've been trying to deal with, but the banking system in general) unwillingness to deal with their debtors is a big reason we're in this mess.
If the banks were to write down mortgage balances for everyone whose house is worth less than the outstanding mortgage balance, where would the write downs end?
If banks write down mortgages for customers who quit paying their mortgages, what are the customers who make their payments going to say? If anything, looks like they'd want to reward the customers who actually pay their bills.
I can't imagine that writing down upside down mortgages would have ended any worse than sending them all to foreclosure has. Since we're already in a mess, I would think the banks would be ready to try something different.
But we're getting close to politics with this tangent, so I'll end my comments there.
I see your point and I feel like my case is different. The bank knows that they aren't getting any more money out of the current owner. I know that the bank knows this and I told them as much. I asked them if they would be willing to negotiate a solution that would release the current owner from her obligation and transfer the deed to me, in exchange for some amount of money less than her current payoff. At the very least this would require the signature of the current mortgage holder. I completely understand that.
I am planning to contact the sheriff's office soon to find out the deal with sheriff's sales. If I buy am I guaranteed a free and clear title? I realize I won't get to see the inside of the trailer, and I really don't care. The price I am willing to pay is based on what the land is worth to me.