Re: Solved the energy shortage problem
Richard:
I've been trying to understand the economics of health care for a while now. When my wife had carpal tunnel surgery a year ago, we got the Insurance statement that listed the hospital charge they paid (Anesthesiologist, hospital room, all the way down to the band-aid to cover the spot where they drew blood) as a total of $5,000. Shortly afterward, I got a statement from the hospital for the same services at a total of $8,000. I called them and they said: "Oh, you shouldn't have gotten that, we made a mistake in sending it to you - ignore it."
So I was wondering how it works. It seemed that, for the same service, the hospital would charge Joe No-insurance $8,000 and United Healthcare (UHC) $5,000. My guess is that UHC "cuts a deal" with the hospital and says "I'll send you all my carpal tunnel surgeries if you give me a good price, say - $5,000" So to get the "guaranteed business", the hospital takes the $5K price and makes maybe 5% profit on each one. Now their target profit is 10% so to make it up they charge our friend Joe No-insurance $8,000 - an extra $3,000.
I can see from your e-mail that you do just the opposite. You charge Joe N-I a lower rate than you charge me (through my insurance company). I realize that some portion of that is what the insurance company "charges" you (30%) and if you net out the same on both then I can understand. But if you make more profit on me (my insurance deal) than you do on Joe in order that your average profit is decent then isn't my insurance company (me, through my premiums) "paying" part of Joe's fair bill.
Really, I'm not pointing fingers here or laying blame, I'm just honestly trying to understand the micro-economics of "doctoring" a little bit.
Thanks for considering answering - and thanks for being in the profession you are.