Small Diesel Engines - Natural Aspiration vs Turbo Charged?

   / Small Diesel Engines - Natural Aspiration vs Turbo Charged? #101  
   / Small Diesel Engines - Natural Aspiration vs Turbo Charged? #102  
Yes, it's just a bushing
 
   / Small Diesel Engines - Natural Aspiration vs Turbo Charged? #103  
They inject extra fuel that ends up getting burned in the DPF.

A catalytic converter causes unburned fuel to catalyze into exhaust products so hydrocarbons dont spew out the exhaust pipe. A DPF (Diesel Particulate Filter) is a filter. It's designed to catch the black soot that comes out of a diesel engine, not cause any chemical reaction like a catalytic converter. Like any filter, DPFs plug up as a byproduct of them doing their job. The regens get them really hot to burn off the accumulated soot. 2 entirely different processes. Diesels typically dont have catalytic converters because they would just plug up from the soot.

Ok, so maybe CAT was not the right "word" still without a turbo to help move air into/through the "DPF", "would it take longer to regen than one with?
I also believe some diesel engines have SCR which I think is a CAT hence DPF fluid. Is it a filter or is it a CAT or is it a filter that uses a catalytic reaction to make it a better filter? Is it just a CAT and it doesn't filter out any soot then? Not sure if the distinction matters for my question, but I could be wrong.
 
   / Small Diesel Engines - Natural Aspiration vs Turbo Charged? #104  
Is that the "bearing" on the left that's really a bushing?
That on the left is the cast iron center of the turbo, the top picture is the bushing that carrying the turbo axle, one on both sides. The bushings are loose fit in the hole, no tool required to get them out. The bushings I do believe takes up som oil so they have lubrication in those short moments the turbo spinns after shutdown. The turbo wheels are so light that I don't believe it spins for many seconds with out oil.

This turbo had around 210000 km and no sign of any wear, the problem with oil use the engine had was stuck rings after very poor maintenance. And it was a diesel, and it was mine since new so it was easy to find the guilty owner ;)
 
   / Small Diesel Engines - Natural Aspiration vs Turbo Charged? #105  
Ok, so maybe CAT was not the right "word" still without a turbo to help move air into/through the "DPF", "would it take longer to regen than one with?
I also believe some diesel engines have SCR which I think is a CAT hence DPF fluid. Is it a filter or is it a CAT or is it a filter that uses a catalytic reaction to make it a better filter? Is it just a CAT and it doesn't filter out any soot then? Not sure if the distinction matters for my question, but I could be wrong.

There are 2 main tier 4 emissions systems I'm aware of. DPF & DEF (Diesel Exhaust Fluid). DEF is urea & sprayed into the exhaust to tamp down some emissions stuff, NOX (Nitrous Oxide) if I recall. Most trucks seem to use DEF, but not tractors (at least until you get to 100+hp machines). You can have DPF & DEF systems on the same engine.

I believe SCR is just a different term for DEF, or the term for the process rather than the consumable component.

When you get down to it, an engine is just a huge air pump. Only the valves & fuel system really differentiate it from your average air compressor. A turbo will help it pump more air, but it's already pretty good at that on own.

The regen cycle on a DPF isn't about moving air through anyway. It's about heating it up to burn off the soot. You need some air & fuel to do that, but at some point more air us just going to cool it off.
 
   / Small Diesel Engines - Natural Aspiration vs Turbo Charged? #106  
The regen cycle on a DPF isn't about moving air through anyway. It's about heating it up to burn off the soot. You need some air & fuel to do that, but at some point more air us just going to cool it off.
Mmmm, when you force air into a fire and it burns hotter it also burns faster? So, on an engine with a turbo and they close the waste gate spooling up the turbo forcing more air through the engine. More raw fuel and air into the CAT, DPF or whatever we want to call it, I would think maybe it would regen faster than say one without?
Also, I'm thinking an air compressor is a bit different than an engine as an air compressor does not have to be concerned about the time it takes to burn fuel and consequently exhaust scavenging and the reason for a turbo. But, I digress. So, the way I see it a turbo is in the future of our smaller diesel engines. You are just not going to be able to get the efficiency needed without one.
 
   / Small Diesel Engines - Natural Aspiration vs Turbo Charged? #107  
The turbo has nothing to do with getting the DPF hotter. The turbo moves more air on the intake side not the exhaust.
 
   / Small Diesel Engines - Natural Aspiration vs Turbo Charged? #108  
The turbo has nothing to do with getting the DPF hotter. The turbo moves more air on the intake side not the exhaust.
understand so how are they getting it any hotter than say when it is normally running at whatever rpm they picked for a parked regen? Why close the waste gate spooling it up faster? The turbo will push air through the cylinder, between the exhaust and intake stroke. There is a period of time between these two strokes when the exhaust valve is closing the intake is opening. (valve over lap)They are both opened at the same time. The turbo forces fresh air in pushing out the exhaust. (exhaust savaging)So, if the turbo was moving more air would it not push more air into the exhaust during this period of time? Then if they inject the fuel latter in the power stoke(think I have that right) That should give them raw fuel and more air in the DPF, hence getting them more heat, faster on an engine with a turbo. Where as on one without a turbo all they could do was inject the fuel latter creating the raw fuel to burn off the soot in the DPF. I have seen separate nozzles(if memory serves me correct) injecting raw fuel directly into the DPF, but without a way to increase air flow through the DPF short of increasing engine rpms I would think it would take longer. Hence my reasoning that an engine with a turbo will have shorter regen times.
 
   / Small Diesel Engines - Natural Aspiration vs Turbo Charged? #109  
Ok, so maybe CAT was not the right "word" still without a turbo to help move air into/through the "DPF", "would it take longer to regen than one with?
I also believe some diesel engines have SCR which I think is a CAT hence DPF fluid. Is it a filter or is it a CAT or is it a filter that uses a catalytic reaction to make it a better filter? Is it just a CAT and it doesn't filter out any soot then? Not sure if the distinction matters for my question, but I could be wrong.

How does a turbo increase airflow through the DPF ?
 
   / Small Diesel Engines - Natural Aspiration vs Turbo Charged? #110  
How does a turbo increase airflow through the DPF ?
inject the fuel such that not all burns and you have raw un-burned fuel, using less air and increase boost. It occurs during exhaust and intake stroke when both valves are open. That gets the fuel and air into the DPF to get it hot. Some how one way or the other you have to increase the amount of air/oxygen going into the DPF or how else how is it going to get hot enough to burn off the soot. Not all of the engines out there have an injector going into the DPF. If it was hot enough during normal operation, why then would we need a regen? They are doing it somehow?
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

2001 J ODell 16ft Enclosed T/A Trailer (A51691)
2001 J ODell 16ft...
UNUSED 70PCS White Metal Roof Panels (A53117)
UNUSED 70PCS White...
CAT CS563 (A47477)
CAT CS563 (A47477)
2010 Ford Edge SE SUV (A51694)
2010 Ford Edge SE...
2018 John Deere 30G Mini Excavator (A52377)
2018 John Deere...
2023 54' Hooklift Dumpster 20 Cubic Yard (A53422)
2023 54' Hooklift...
 
Top