dmccarty
Super Star Member
First of all the officers have to have probable cause to make an arrest. They have to develop that from the stop. Nothing has changed there.
There are valid reasons for gun ownership. I really don't think there is a valid reason for being a drunk driver. Again, the courts have decided again and again and again that driving on public roads is a privilage not a right. My state requires minimum levels of insurance coverage. Is that reasonable? Its forcing people to pay for something they may not need. If the chance of being dragged into a check point is so horrible then don't drive on the public roads. Its simple. Hire a taxi that way when The Man casts his net, one can excercise their constitutional right to not say a word. And since the taxi driving will have to show his OL this should not be hard.
Remember the courts have set limits on check points. They have to be planned and documented. They location and length of the checkpoint has to be in the plan. WHICH cars are stopped has to be in the plan and followed. If the check point is not conducted by the letter of the law any arrests made as part of the check point will be thrown out of court. Can't say that would happen in a totalitarian state.
Is a check point valid or a violation of civil liberties to cast a net for a cop killer? Say in NY state?
Later,
Dan
There are valid reasons for gun ownership. I really don't think there is a valid reason for being a drunk driver. Again, the courts have decided again and again and again that driving on public roads is a privilage not a right. My state requires minimum levels of insurance coverage. Is that reasonable? Its forcing people to pay for something they may not need. If the chance of being dragged into a check point is so horrible then don't drive on the public roads. Its simple. Hire a taxi that way when The Man casts his net, one can excercise their constitutional right to not say a word. And since the taxi driving will have to show his OL this should not be hard.
Remember the courts have set limits on check points. They have to be planned and documented. They location and length of the checkpoint has to be in the plan. WHICH cars are stopped has to be in the plan and followed. If the check point is not conducted by the letter of the law any arrests made as part of the check point will be thrown out of court. Can't say that would happen in a totalitarian state.
Is a check point valid or a violation of civil liberties to cast a net for a cop killer? Say in NY state?
Later,
Dan