Space Station
- Thread starter mjarrels
- Start date
- Views: 4964
Tom_H
Veteran Member
MikePA said:
The man's words do not need explaining. They clearly speak for themselves. Rather than acknowledging the man's obvious plainspokenness, you seem to have some need to pretend his meaning is obscure and somehow unclear. It isn't. So let me save you some trouble. The man stated that he had heard the paying passenger going to the space station is a woman, an Iranian American and, a Muslim. He closes by saying he hopes he is wrong.
I am willing to acknowledge that the man is exactly what he appears to be. You are not. In doing this, you ARE defending him.
Tom_H
Veteran Member
You know, mjarrels does deserve an opportunity to return here and explain himself. In fact, I would be MOST interested in hearing him explain exactly what he meant. To that end I have sent him a P.M., the exact text of which appears below. So let's see if he is willing to come back and explain himself.
Please visit the thread you statred re. the space station. There you will see that a number of us believe that your meaning was explicitly clear in that you hope that you wrongly heard that the visitor to the space station is an Iranian American Musilm woman.
On the other hand, a couple of members believe that your meaning somehow is not clear, that it doesn't actually mean what it says, that if you come back to the thread and explain your words, we will find that there was some other meaning and the rest of us are mistaken in our belief that your words clearly express exactly what you meant them to.
Please return to the board, mjarrels. We want to know. If you meant what many of us think you clearly said, I would very much like to hear you publicly expound on your comments. Are you willing to return and speak your mind? Alternatively, if you didn't mean to say what you said, would you please return and explain what you meant to say?
Please visit the thread you statred re. the space station. There you will see that a number of us believe that your meaning was explicitly clear in that you hope that you wrongly heard that the visitor to the space station is an Iranian American Musilm woman.
On the other hand, a couple of members believe that your meaning somehow is not clear, that it doesn't actually mean what it says, that if you come back to the thread and explain your words, we will find that there was some other meaning and the rest of us are mistaken in our belief that your words clearly express exactly what you meant them to.
Please return to the board, mjarrels. We want to know. If you meant what many of us think you clearly said, I would very much like to hear you publicly expound on your comments. Are you willing to return and speak your mind? Alternatively, if you didn't mean to say what you said, would you please return and explain what you meant to say?
Inspector507
Super Member
Tom_H said:
He did return........
Glad I was wrong... but I did get a little nervous about the unexplained chemical leak next to a O2 generator.
bugstruck
Platinum Member
Tom_H said:
Tom, He's a retired warrior and your a guy who talks about people, places, and things. So where exactly is your high ground and how will YOU defend it? 10 posts later you'll have tried.
MikePA
Super Moderator
Do not put words in my mouth. I specifically stated I am NOT defending him.Tom_H said:
You have a penchant for doing this. Instead of allowing mjarrels to explain himself, you've 'educated' all of us with what he really meant and now you're doing the same thing to me.
A man stated his opinion. Interpret it as you will, agree or disagree. Provide some facts if you expect him to convert to your disagreeing point of view, otherwise be content to speak your piece as he has spoken his.
That's an unfortunate yet all too common trend in modern academia based on my own personal (and limited, I freely admit) experiences....education by demeanment and intimidation, driven by an uncanny ability to "know" what the rest of us might require some substantiation to believe--or may simply disagree with as a matter of preference. No questions need be asked, no facts gathered, no information processed. A large dose of general arrogance is usually involved. Also an overriding unwillingness to allow differing opinions or attitudes to even exist.
I can disagree strongly and profoundly with any of you and walk away comfortable in my own beliefs....I may "shake my head" internally in amazement, but I have no need to force you to accept my position; just allow me to live in peace with my own positions. My experiences with academic professionals have demonstrated them all too often to have a need to drown out opposing positions to the point of eradication. Their efforts seem to redefine beating a dead horse. Just my $.02 worth. I still wish you a good day whether you agree or disagree....but if you have a need for me to abandon my position or succumb to the way you think....well, then I don't really care what kind of day you have.
That's an unfortunate yet all too common trend in modern academia based on my own personal (and limited, I freely admit) experiences....education by demeanment and intimidation, driven by an uncanny ability to "know" what the rest of us might require some substantiation to believe--or may simply disagree with as a matter of preference. No questions need be asked, no facts gathered, no information processed. A large dose of general arrogance is usually involved. Also an overriding unwillingness to allow differing opinions or attitudes to even exist.
I can disagree strongly and profoundly with any of you and walk away comfortable in my own beliefs....I may "shake my head" internally in amazement, but I have no need to force you to accept my position; just allow me to live in peace with my own positions. My experiences with academic professionals have demonstrated them all too often to have a need to drown out opposing positions to the point of eradication. Their efforts seem to redefine beating a dead horse. Just my $.02 worth. I still wish you a good day whether you agree or disagree....but if you have a need for me to abandon my position or succumb to the way you think....well, then I don't really care what kind of day you have.
OP
mjarrels
Elite Member
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2005
- Messages
- 2,837
- Location
- Virginia
- Tractor
- 1949 farmall, 1961 Fordson Dexta, 1986 Duetz Allis, 2001 Kubota.
My point is risk assessment. Loyality is no longer a issue in todays world nor is dollars. The destruction of the space station would set back decades of work and be the ultimate in destruction.
I have a "Saffari to Suez" plaque in the garage... May 1981 the USS American Battle Group went thru the Suez canel... fun trip and I had a great time but can you vision a entire US Navy Battle Group trapped in the Canel? Take about setting ducks. Was the time and DFM (diesel fuel marine) worth it? I don't think so.
The world has changed and I think we need to look at things differently. Yes, I am for racial profiling.
Who put the dead rabbit on my fence last night?
"VC-5 Checker Tails"
mark
I have a "Saffari to Suez" plaque in the garage... May 1981 the USS American Battle Group went thru the Suez canel... fun trip and I had a great time but can you vision a entire US Navy Battle Group trapped in the Canel? Take about setting ducks. Was the time and DFM (diesel fuel marine) worth it? I don't think so.
The world has changed and I think we need to look at things differently. Yes, I am for racial profiling.
Who put the dead rabbit on my fence last night?
"VC-5 Checker Tails"
mark
riptides
Super Member
This thread should be locked and or deleted, it serves no tractorial purpose.
-Mike Z.
-Mike Z.
